PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGBL vs. NTSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CGBLNTSX
YTD Return17.30%21.44%
1Y Return27.26%34.12%
Sharpe Ratio2.972.73
Sortino Ratio4.163.74
Omega Ratio1.561.48
Calmar Ratio4.741.83
Martin Ratio20.2118.24
Ulcer Index1.39%1.90%
Daily Std Dev9.47%12.70%
Max Drawdown-5.93%-31.34%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between CGBL and NTSX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CGBL vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CGBL achieves a 17.30% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 21.44% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.99%
14.17%
CGBL
NTSX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGBL vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGBL has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Expense ratio chart for CGBL: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%
Expense ratio chart for NTSX: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGBL vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGBL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 2.97, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.97
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 4.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.56
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 4.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 20.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0020.21
NTSX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NTSX, currently valued at 2.73, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.73
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NTSX, currently valued at 3.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NTSX, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NTSX, currently valued at 5.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NTSX, currently valued at 18.24, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0018.24

CGBL vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGBL Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBL and NTSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.402.602.803.003.203.40Wed 02Fri 04Oct 06Tue 08Thu 10Sat 12Mon 14Wed 16Fri 18Oct 20Tue 22Thu 24Sat 26Mon 28Wed 30NovemberNov 03Tue 05
2.97
2.73
CGBL
NTSX

Dividends

CGBL vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

CGBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than NTSX's 1.06% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
1.67%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.06%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.53%0.62%

Drawdowns

CGBL vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBL drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBL and NTSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
CGBL
NTSX

Volatility

CGBL vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) is 2.73%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that CGBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.73%
3.56%
CGBL
NTSX