PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGBL vs. AOA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CGBLAOA
YTD Return17.07%14.90%
1Y Return24.80%22.27%
Sharpe Ratio2.842.53
Sortino Ratio3.973.56
Omega Ratio1.531.47
Calmar Ratio4.523.40
Martin Ratio19.2216.66
Ulcer Index1.39%1.49%
Daily Std Dev9.45%9.81%
Max Drawdown-5.93%-28.38%
Current Drawdown-1.25%-1.22%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between CGBL and AOA is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CGBL vs. AOA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CGBL achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than AOA's 14.90% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.33%
6.43%
CGBL
AOA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGBL vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGBL has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio.


CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Expense ratio chart for CGBL: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%
Expense ratio chart for AOA: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGBL vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGBL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 2.84, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 3.97, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.97
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 4.52, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 19.22, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0019.22
AOA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AOA, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AOA, currently valued at 3.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.56
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AOA, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AOA, currently valued at 3.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.98
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AOA, currently valued at 16.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0016.66

CGBL vs. AOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGBL Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the AOA Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBL and AOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.402.602.803.003.203.40Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10
2.84
2.53
CGBL
AOA

Dividends

CGBL vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison

CGBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than AOA's 2.10% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
1.67%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.10%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.02%2.15%2.18%1.84%

Drawdowns

CGBL vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBL drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBL and AOA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.25%
-1.22%
CGBL
AOA

Volatility

CGBL vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.73%
2.64%
CGBL
AOA