CGHY vs. HYLB

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CGHY (Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGHY charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HYLB.

Performance

CGHY vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGHY achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than HYLB's 1.17% return.

CGHY

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 6M: 2.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYLB

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 1.58%
• 1Y: 6.46%
• 3Y*: 8.57%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGHY vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF	1.65%	3.77%
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.17%	3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CGHY and HYLB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

CGHY vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLB

HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 59
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 57
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGHY vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGHY	HYLB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	0.58	+1.17

Drawdowns

CGHY vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGHY drawdown since its inception was -2.38%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHY and HYLB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGHY	HYLB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.38%	-22.91%	+20.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.27%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.55%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-2.43%	+2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGHY	HYLB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36%	3.73%	-0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.36%	7.47%	-4.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.36%	8.18%	-4.82%

CGHY vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGHY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGHY vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison

CGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, less than HYLB's 6.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF	5.10%	3.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.51%	6.29%	6.31%	5.84%	5.53%	4.45%	5.22%	5.71%	5.95%	5.85%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGHY and HYLB in my portfolio?

CGHY and HYLB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGHY or HYLB?

On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGHY or HYLB?

HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGHY or HYLB?

HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 5.10% for CGHY.

What is the main difference between CGHY and HYLB?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGHY and 0.15% for HYLB.