PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGHY vs. CGCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGHY vs. CGCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGHY achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than CGCV's 9.41% return.


CGHY

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.09%
6M
1.82%
YTD
2.14%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGCV

1D
0.39%
1M
2.66%
6M
7.40%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGHY vs. CGCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGHY and CGCV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.62

The correlation between CGHY and CGCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGHY vs. CGCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGHY
CGHY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CGHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CGCV
CGCV Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CGCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGHY vs. CGCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGHYCGCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.99

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.76

8.04

+3.73

CGHY vs. CGCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the CGCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGHY and CGCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGHY vs. CGCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGHY drawdown since its inception was -2.38%, smaller than the maximum CGCV drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHY and CGCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGHYCGCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-13.13%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.38%

-7.93%

+5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-1.60%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

1.96%

-1.44%

Volatility

CGHY vs. CGCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) is 0.71%, while Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that CGHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGHYCGCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

2.47%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

7.59%

-4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30%

9.85%

-6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.28%

12.48%

-9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.28%

12.48%

-9.20%

CGHY vs. CGCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGHY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGHY vs. CGCV - Dividend Comparison

CGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than CGCV's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CGCV
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
1.45%1.44%0.68%
CGHY
Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF
5.46%3.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGHY and CGCV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGCV has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to CGHY (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGHY dropped -2.38% vs CGCV's -13.13%.

On 1-year performance, CGCV leads with 16.10% vs 6.22% for CGHY. On fees, CGCV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGCV has performed better with a 16.10% return vs 6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGCV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGHY.

CGHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 1.45% for CGCV.

CGHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CGCV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGHY and 0.33% for CGCV.

CGHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGHY and CGCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer