CGHY vs. CGGO
CGHY (Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF) and CGGO (Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Capital Group, while CGGO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGHY charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for CGGO.
Performance
CGHY vs. CGGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGHY achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than CGGO's 17.98% return.
CGHY
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGGO
- 1D
- -4.02%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 17.98%
- 6M
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 34.69%
- 3Y*
- 21.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGHY vs. CGGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF | 2.07% | 3.83% |
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | 17.98% | 12.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGHY and CGGO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGHY vs. CGGO — Risk / Return Rank
CGHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CGGO
CGHY vs. CGGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGHY | CGGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGHY vs. CGGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGHY drawdown since its inception was -2.38%, smaller than the maximum CGGO drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHY and CGGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGHY | CGGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -24.90% | +22.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -4.02% | +3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -5.46% | +5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.98% | — |
Volatility
CGHY vs. CGGO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGHY | CGGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32% | 18.89% | -15.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 18.99% | -15.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 18.99% | -15.67% |
CGHY vs. CGGO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGHY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CGGO's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGHY vs. CGGO - Dividend Comparison
CGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than CGGO's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | 1.72% | 2.03% | 1.10% | 0.76% | 0.59% |
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF | 5.08% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGHY and CGGO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGHY is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGHY is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGGO.
CGHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 1.72% for CGGO.
CGHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CGGO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGHY and 0.47% for CGGO.
Find the right allocation for CGHY and CGGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer