CGHY vs. CGCP
CGHY (Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF) and CGCP (Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Capital Group, while CGCP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past year, CGHY returned 6.10% vs 4.31% for CGCP. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGHY charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for CGCP.
Performance
CGHY vs. CGCP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGHY achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than CGCP's 0.16% return.
CGHY
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 6.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGCP
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- 6M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGHY vs. CGCP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF | 2.06% | 3.83% |
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 0.16% | 3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGHY and CGCP is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CGHY and CGCP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGHY vs. CGCP — Risk / Return Rank
CGHY
CGCP
CGHY vs. CGCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGHY | CGCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.21 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 1.67 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.74 | 5.16 | +6.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGHY vs. CGCP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGHY drawdown since its inception was -2.38%, smaller than the maximum CGCP drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHY and CGCP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGHY | CGCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -15.06% | +12.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.38% | -2.59% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -1.34% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.30% | -4.82% | +4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 0.84% | -0.32% |
Volatility
CGHY vs. CGCP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) is 0.66%, while Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that CGHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGHY | CGCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 1.13% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 2.93% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31% | 3.67% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 6.31% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 6.31% | -3.03% |
CGHY vs. CGCP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGHY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCP's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGHY vs. CGCP - Dividend Comparison
CGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than CGCP's 5.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 5.17% | 5.10% | 5.17% | 4.98% | 2.96% |
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF | 5.46% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGHY and CGCP have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGCP has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to CGHY (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGHY dropped -2.38% vs CGCP's -15.06%.
On 1-year performance, CGHY leads with 6.10% vs 4.31% for CGCP. On fees, CGCP is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, CGHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CGHY has performed better with a 6.10% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGCP is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGHY.
CGHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 5.17% for CGCP.
CGHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CGCP is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGHY and 0.34% for CGCP.
CGHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGHY and CGCP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer