CGGG vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGGG returned 8.30% vs 279.21% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.53, they often move in opposite directions. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

CGGG vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's 1.05% return.

CGGG

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -3.86%
• YTD: -2.35%
• 6M: -3.18%
• 1Y: 8.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 19.27%
• 1M: 186.45%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 9.89%
• 1Y: 279.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGG vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	-2.35%	10.90%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	1.05%	275.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGG and MSTZ is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	-0.53

Return for Risk

CGGG vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 62
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGG vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGGG	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.93	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.48	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.31	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.57	—

Drawdowns

CGGG vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGG	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-99.38%	+81.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.75%	-84.89%	+67.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.16%	-96.56%	+90.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-94.46%	+90.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	42.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGG	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	46.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	129.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.26%	145.84%	-127.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.26%	170.65%	-152.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.26%	170.65%	-152.39%

CGGG vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGG vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	0.07%	0.07%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGG and MSTZ in my portfolio?

CGGG and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGGG or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 279.21% vs 8.30% for CGGG. On fees, CGGG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGGG or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 279.21% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGG or MSTZ?

CGGG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGG or MSTZ?

CGGG has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between CGGG and MSTZ?

CGGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 1.05% for MSTZ.