CGGG vs. HDV
CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. CGGG is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
CGGG vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 14.07% return.
CGGG
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -2.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
CGGG vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | -1.93% | 10.90% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 14.07% | 6.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGGG and HDV is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGGG vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
CGGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HDV
CGGG vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGGG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGGG vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGGG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -37.04% | +19.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -1.35% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -3.08% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility
CGGG vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGGG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 9.93% | +8.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 12.81% | +5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 15.73% | +2.60% |
CGGG vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGGG vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than HDV's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.90% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGGG and HDV have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGGG.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.07% for CGGG.
CGGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.08% for HDV.
Find the right allocation for CGGG and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer