CGGG vs. CCOR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

CGGG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -3.71% return.

CGGG

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 2.00%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -2.55%
• YTD: -3.71%
• 6M: -4.87%
• 1Y: -5.97%
• 3Y*: -2.34%
• 5Y*: -2.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	2.00%	10.45%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-3.71%	-1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGG and CCOR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	-0.06

Return for Risk

CGGG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 2
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGG	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.11	+0.67

Drawdowns

CGGG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGG	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-22.99%	+5.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.75%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.98%	-20.03%	+18.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-7.29%	+3.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.77%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGG	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.50%	6.93%	+10.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	11.10%	+6.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	10.75%	+6.75%

CGGG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than CCOR's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.11%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	0.07%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGG and CCOR in my portfolio?

CGGG and CCOR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGGG or CCOR?

On fees, CGGG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGG or CCOR?

CGGG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGG or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.07% for CGGG.

What is the main difference between CGGG and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 1.09% for CCOR.