CGGE vs. CGBL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL).

CGGE and CGBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGGE is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Jun 25, 2024. CGBL is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023.

Performance

CGGE vs. CGBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGGE vs. CGBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGGE Capital Group Global Equity ETF	-2.28%	24.50%	2.30%
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	-1.67%	15.33%	6.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGE achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than CGBL's -1.67% return.

CGGE

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: -5.21%
• YTD: -2.28%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 19.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGBL

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -4.69%
• YTD: -1.67%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 13.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGE vs. CGBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than CGBL's 0.33% expense ratio.

CGGE

Capital Group Global Equity ETF

CGBL

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF

Return for Risk

CGGE vs. CGBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGE

CGGE Risk / Return Rank: 64
CGGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CGGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CGGE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CGGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CGGE Martin Ratio Rank: 68

CGBL

CGBL Risk / Return Rank: 63
CGBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CGBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CGBL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CGBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CGBL Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGE vs. CGBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGGE	CGBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.10	+0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	1.64	+0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.23	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	1.73	+0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.59	7.00	+0.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGGE vs. CGBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGGE Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the CGBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGGE and CGBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGE	CGBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	1.10	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.47	-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between CGGE and CGBL is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CGGE vs. CGBL - Dividend Comparison

CGGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than CGBL's 2.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CGGE Capital Group Global Equity ETF	0.41%	0.40%	0.35%	0.00%
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	2.03%	1.98%	1.92%	0.48%

Drawdowns

CGGE vs. CGBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGE drawdown since its inception was -14.44%, which is greater than CGBL's maximum drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGE and CGBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGE	CGBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.44%	-11.66%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.03%	-8.11%	-2.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.67%	-5.26%	-1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-1.31%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.00%	+0.64%

Volatility

CGGE vs. CGBL - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) at 4.54%. This indicates that CGGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGGE	CGBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.72%	4.54%	+2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.69%	7.40%	+3.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.05%	12.41%	+4.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.28%	11.01%	+4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.28%	11.01%	+4.27%