PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGGE vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGGE vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGE achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 4.71% return.


CGGE

1D
-0.66%
1M
4.96%
YTD
9.07%
6M
10.03%
1Y
22.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDVL

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.91%
YTD
4.71%
6M
5.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGE vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGGE and BDVL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.83

CGGE vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGGE
BDVL

Technology

29.7%
23.0%

Industrials

18.4%
15.4%

Financial Services

14.3%
13.9%

Communication Services

9.0%
10.7%

Healthcare

7.2%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
8.5%

Utilities

4.8%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
6.3%

Energy

3.2%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.8%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.0%

Technology

CGGE
29.7%
BDVL
23.0%

Industrials

CGGE
18.4%
BDVL
15.4%

Financial Services

CGGE
14.3%
BDVL
13.9%

Communication Services

CGGE
9.0%
BDVL
10.7%

Healthcare

CGGE
7.2%
BDVL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CGGE
5.0%
BDVL
8.5%

Utilities

CGGE
4.8%
BDVL
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

CGGE
4.5%
BDVL
6.3%

Energy

CGGE
3.2%
BDVL
2.8%

Basic Materials

CGGE
2.8%
BDVL
2.6%

Real Estate

CGGE
1.0%
BDVL
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGGE vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGE
CGGE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CGGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGGE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CGGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGGE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BDVL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGE vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGGEBDVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

CGGE vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGGEBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.01

+0.20

Drawdowns

CGGE vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGE drawdown since its inception was -14.44%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGE and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGGEBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.44%

-7.71%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.95%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.77%

-1.19%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

Volatility

CGGE vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGGEBDVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

9.49%

+4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

9.49%

+5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

9.49%

+5.90%

CGGE vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGGE vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

CGGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than BDVL's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
2.66%2.79%0.00%
CGGE
Capital Group Global Equity ETF
0.37%0.40%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGGE and BDVL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGGE.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.37% for CGGE.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGGE and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGGE and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer