PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGDV vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGDV vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 14.21% return.


CGDV

1D
0.68%
1M
5.08%
YTD
12.65%
6M
13.07%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
25.65%
5Y*
10Y*

FDL

1D
0.78%
1M
0.32%
YTD
14.21%
6M
15.52%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDV vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
12.65%25.50%20.10%28.81%-2.89%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
14.21%14.79%17.98%2.94%8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDV and FDL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between CGDV and FDL has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CGDV vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGDV
FDL

Technology

34.1%
1.1%

Industrials

13.2%
3.8%

Healthcare

11.5%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
3.8%

Communication Services

8.4%
10.6%

Financial Services

6.8%
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
14.7%

Energy

3.8%
27.3%

Basic Materials

2.9%
0.3%

Utilities

2.1%
6.5%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Technology

CGDV
34.1%
FDL
1.1%

Industrials

CGDV
13.2%
FDL
3.8%

Healthcare

CGDV
11.5%
FDL
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CGDV
10.6%
FDL
3.8%

Communication Services

CGDV
8.4%
FDL
10.6%

Financial Services

CGDV
6.8%
FDL
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

CGDV
5.5%
FDL
14.7%

Energy

CGDV
3.8%
FDL
27.3%

Basic Materials

CGDV
2.9%
FDL
0.3%

Utilities

CGDV
2.1%
FDL
6.5%

Real Estate

CGDV
1.1%
FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGDV vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDV vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGDVFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.40

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

5.99

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.36

14.59

+0.77

CGDV vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDV and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGDVFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.27

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.45

+0.80

Drawdowns

CGDV vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGDVFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-65.93%

+44.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-4.27%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.28%

-12.24%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.41%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-9.66%

+6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.75%

+0.31%

Volatility

CGDV vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) have volatilities of 3.08% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGDVFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.95%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

7.85%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

11.30%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

14.31%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.48%

17.11%

-1.63%

CGDV vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGDV vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than FDL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.16%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.65%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGDV and FDL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGDV has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to FDL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 25.65% vs 19.57% for FDL. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 25.65% return vs 19.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.16% for CGDV.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGDV and 0.45% for FDL.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGDV and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer