PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGBL vs. CGDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGBL vs. CGDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGBL achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly higher than CGDG's 5.77% return.


CGBL

1D
0.24%
1M
0.51%
YTD
7.02%
6M
6.23%
1Y
16.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGDG

1D
0.67%
1M
0.03%
YTD
5.77%
6M
5.14%
1Y
15.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGBL vs. CGDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
7.02%15.33%16.64%10.10%
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
5.77%22.74%11.52%10.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CGBL and CGDG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023

0.85

The correlation between CGBL and CGDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGBL vs. CGDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGBL
CGBL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CGBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGBL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CGBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGBL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDG
CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGBL vs. CGDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGBLCGDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

1.98

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.01

7.59

+1.42

CGBL vs. CGDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the CGDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBL and CGDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGBL vs. CGDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBL drawdown since its inception was -11.66%, which is greater than CGDG's maximum drawdown of -10.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBL and CGDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGBLCGDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-10.52%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.88%

-7.72%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.77%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-1.31%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

2.01%

-0.20%

Volatility

CGBL vs. CGDG - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) at 3.03%. This indicates that CGBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGBLCGDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

3.03%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

8.50%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

10.79%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.15%

12.14%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.15%

12.14%

-0.99%

CGBL vs. CGDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGBL has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDG's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGBL vs. CGDG - Dividend Comparison

CGBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, which matches CGDG's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
1.86%1.98%1.92%0.48%
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
1.87%1.95%2.15%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGBL and CGDG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGBL has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to CGDG (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGBL dropped -11.66% vs CGDG's -10.52%.

On 1-year performance, CGBL leads with 16.28% vs 15.20% for CGDG. On fees, CGBL is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGBL has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 15.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGBL is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGDG.

CGDG has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.86% for CGBL.

CGBL is categorized as Allocation--50% to 70% Equity, while CGDG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGBL and 0.47% for CGDG.

CGBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGBL and CGDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer