PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFR vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFR achieves a 19.70% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CFR has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.42%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


CFR

1D
2.56%
1M
8.00%
YTD
19.70%
6M
17.12%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
12.42%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFR
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
19.70%-2.76%27.86%-16.06%8.66%48.17%-7.58%14.60%-4.84%9.93%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CFR and VOO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between CFR and VOO has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFR
CFR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CFRVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.39

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.02

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

13.58

-9.97

CFR vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFR and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CFR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFR drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFR and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFRVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.86%

-33.99%

-22.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.95%

-8.90%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-18.69%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.62%

-24.52%

-21.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.86%

-33.99%

-22.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.74%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.81%

-3.68%

-8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.56%

1.98%

+4.58%

Volatility

CFR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that CFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFRVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

4.60%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

9.73%

+5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.11%

12.39%

+9.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.15%

16.90%

+13.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.29%

18.05%

+15.24%

Dividends

CFR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFR
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
2.70%3.12%2.79%3.30%2.42%2.33%3.27%2.86%2.93%2.38%2.44%3.50%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFR and VOO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFR has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFR dropped -56.86% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFR and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer