PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CFR vs. MTB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CFRMTB
YTD Return33.38%59.68%
1Y Return55.72%89.24%
3Y Return (Ann)5.14%13.90%
5Y Return (Ann)12.02%9.11%
10Y Return (Ann)9.00%8.47%
Sharpe Ratio1.952.97
Sortino Ratio2.814.05
Omega Ratio1.341.50
Calmar Ratio1.462.39
Martin Ratio7.7121.05
Ulcer Index7.40%4.13%
Daily Std Dev29.33%29.22%
Max Drawdown-56.86%-73.50%
Current Drawdown-5.05%-1.54%

Fundamentals


CFRMTB
Market Cap$9.17B$35.38B
EPS$7.95$13.52
PE Ratio17.7315.77
PEG Ratio1.921.37
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.32B$12.37B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.49B$12.37B
EBITDA (TTM)$465.94M$1.59B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between CFR and MTB is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CFR vs. MTB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CFR achieves a 33.38% return, which is significantly lower than MTB's 59.68% return. Over the past 10 years, CFR has outperformed MTB with an annualized return of 9.00%, while MTB has yielded a comparatively lower 8.47% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
33.03%
39.85%
CFR
MTB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CFR vs. MTB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CFR, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CFR, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CFR, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CFR, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CFR, currently valued at 7.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.71
MTB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MTB, currently valued at 2.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.97
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MTB, currently valued at 4.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MTB, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.50
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MTB, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MTB, currently valued at 21.05, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0021.05

CFR vs. MTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the MTB Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFR and MTB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.95
2.97
CFR
MTB

Dividends

CFR vs. MTB - Dividend Comparison

CFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than MTB's 2.49% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CFR
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
2.63%3.30%2.42%2.33%3.27%2.86%2.93%2.38%2.44%3.50%2.87%2.66%
MTB
M&T Bank Corporation
2.49%3.79%3.31%2.93%3.46%2.42%2.48%1.75%1.79%2.31%2.23%2.41%

Drawdowns

CFR vs. MTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFR drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, smaller than the maximum MTB drawdown of -73.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFR and MTB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.05%
-1.54%
CFR
MTB

Volatility

CFR vs. MTB - Volatility Comparison

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) have volatilities of 14.75% and 14.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.75%
14.16%
CFR
MTB

Financials

CFR vs. MTB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. and M&T Bank Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items