CFR vs. RF
Compare and contrast key facts about Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CFR or RF.
Correlation
The correlation between CFR and RF is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CFR vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CFR:
1.12
RF:
1.32
CFR:
1.81
RF:
2.03
CFR:
1.22
RF:
1.25
CFR:
0.86
RF:
1.55
CFR:
4.21
RF:
4.97
CFR:
7.44%
RF:
6.88%
CFR:
27.97%
RF:
25.87%
CFR:
-56.86%
RF:
-92.65%
CFR:
-7.34%
RF:
-14.14%
Fundamentals
CFR:
$8.78B
RF:
$21.16B
CFR:
$8.87
RF:
$1.93
CFR:
15.41
RF:
12.11
CFR:
1.92
RF:
4.54
CFR:
$2.24B
RF:
$8.19B
CFR:
$2.41B
RF:
$6.96B
CFR:
$582.21M
RF:
$1.88B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFR achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than RF's -0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CFR has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 10.40%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return.
CFR
1.80%
-1.92%
25.32%
31.38%
13.84%
10.40%
RF
-0.64%
-4.50%
4.77%
34.18%
15.73%
13.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CFR vs. RF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CFR
RF
CFR vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CFR vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
CFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than RF's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFR Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. | 2.74% | 2.79% | 3.30% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 2.86% | 2.93% | 2.38% | 2.44% | 3.50% | 2.87% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.19% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
CFR vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFR drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFR and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CFR vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 5.94%. This indicates that CFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CFR vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities