PortfoliosLab logo
CFR vs. RF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CFR and RF is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CFR vs. RF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CFR:

0.76

RF:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

CFR:

1.31

RF:

1.02

Omega Ratio

CFR:

1.17

RF:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

CFR:

0.70

RF:

0.55

Martin Ratio

CFR:

2.75

RF:

1.48

Ulcer Index

CFR:

9.26%

RF:

11.95%

Daily Std Dev

CFR:

32.12%

RF:

30.79%

Max Drawdown

CFR:

-56.86%

RF:

-92.65%

Current Drawdown

CFR:

-11.22%

RF:

-17.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CFR:

$8.36B

RF:

$20.00B

EPS

CFR:

$9.11

RF:

$2.07

PE Ratio

CFR:

14.27

RF:

10.75

PEG Ratio

CFR:

4.64

RF:

2.74

PS Ratio

CFR:

4.10

RF:

3.00

PB Ratio

CFR:

2.02

RF:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

CFR:

$2.47B

RF:

$8.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CFR:

$2.37B

RF:

$8.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

CFR:

$605.83M

RF:

$3.14B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFR achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly higher than RF's -4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CFR has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 9.06%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.


CFR

YTD

-2.47%

1M

20.69%

6M

-7.84%

1Y

24.35%

5Y*

20.76%

10Y*

9.06%

RF

YTD

-4.39%

1M

17.29%

6M

-13.38%

1Y

17.16%

5Y*

25.17%

10Y*

12.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CFR vs. RF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CFR is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CFR is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CFR is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CFR is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CFR is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CFR is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

RF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RF is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RF is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RF is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RF is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RF is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RF is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CFR vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the RF Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFR and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CFR vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

CFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than RF's 4.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CFR
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
2.90%2.79%3.30%2.42%2.33%3.27%2.86%2.93%2.38%2.44%3.50%2.87%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
4.45%4.17%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%

Drawdowns

CFR vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFR drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFR and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CFR vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) is 7.48%, while Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that CFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CFR vs. RF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
540.23M
2.32B
(CFR) Total Revenue
(RF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items