PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFR vs. PB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CFR vs. PB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) and Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFR achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than PB's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CFR has outperformed PB with an annualized return of 12.46%, while PB has yielded a comparatively lower 7.12% annualized return.


CFR

1D
0.39%
1M
8.42%
YTD
20.18%
6M
17.69%
1Y
22.20%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
12.46%

PB

1D
1.05%
1M
5.55%
YTD
6.49%
6M
3.98%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
7.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFR vs. PB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFR
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
20.18%-2.76%27.86%-16.06%8.66%48.17%-7.58%14.60%-4.84%9.93%
PB
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
6.49%-5.15%15.06%-3.34%3.64%7.13%-0.27%18.19%-9.22%-0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CFR and PB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 1998

0.65

The correlation between CFR and PB shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CFR:

$13.92

PB:

$5.50

PE Ratio

CFR:

10.77

PB:

13.15

PEG Ratio

CFR:

0.99

PB:

8.39

PS Ratio

CFR:

2.58

PB:

5.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

CFR:

$2.79B

PB:

$1.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CFR:

$1.66B

PB:

$930.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

CFR:

$658.50M

PB:

$674.35M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFR vs. PB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFR
CFR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

PB
PB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PB Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PB Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFR vs. PB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) and Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CFRPBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.08

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

0.51

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

0.96

+2.43

CFR vs. PB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the PB Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFR and PB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CFR vs. PB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFR drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, which is greater than PB's maximum drawdown of -47.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFR and PB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFRPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.86%

-47.89%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.95%

-16.45%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-24.84%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.62%

-34.37%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.86%

-42.24%

-14.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.88%

+9.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.81%

-10.73%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.56%

8.64%

-2.08%

Volatility

CFR vs. PB - Volatility Comparison

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB) at 5.38%. This indicates that CFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFRPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

5.38%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

16.61%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

23.00%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.15%

25.42%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.21%

30.64%

+2.57%

Dividends

CFR vs. PB - Dividend Comparison

CFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than PB's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFR
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
2.69%3.12%2.79%3.30%2.42%2.33%3.27%2.86%2.93%2.38%2.44%3.50%
PB
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
3.29%3.39%3.00%3.26%2.90%2.75%2.70%2.35%2.39%1.97%1.73%2.33%

Financials

CFR vs. PB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. and Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
577.97M
0
(CFR) Total Revenue
(PB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CFR and PB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFR has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to PB (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFR dropped -56.86% vs PB's -47.89%.

CFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFR and PB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer