CFO vs. FTIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CFO (VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CFO tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index while FTIF tracks the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CFO returned 10.44%/yr vs 16.19%/yr for FTIF. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.

Performance

CFO vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFO achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 25.81% return.

CFO

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 6M: 6.96%
• 1Y: 13.59%
• 3Y*: 10.44%
• 5Y*: 3.88%
• 10Y*: 9.36%

FTIF

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 25.81%
• 6M: 24.44%
• 1Y: 36.91%
• 3Y*: 16.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFO vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF	6.66%	8.60%	15.37%	2.11%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	25.81%	7.79%	0.50%	12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CFO and FTIF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2023	0.77

The correlation between CFO and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CFO vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CFO	FTIF
Industrials	18.4%	16.5%
Financial Services	18.3%	-
Technology	14.9%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	3.2%
Healthcare	9.5%	-
Utilities	9.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	-
Energy	5.5%	44.1%
Basic Materials	3.6%	20.1%
Communication Services	3.6%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	12.1%

Return for Risk

CFO vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFO

CFO Risk / Return Rank: 38
CFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CFO Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
CFO Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 81
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFO vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFO	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	2.48	-1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	3.41	-1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.43	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	6.79	-4.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.10	20.14	-13.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFO vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFO Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFO and FTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFO	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	2.48	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.75	-0.10

Drawdowns

CFO vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFO drawdown since its inception was -24.35%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFO and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFO	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.35%	-27.83%	+3.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.10%	-5.46%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.25%	-27.83%	+10.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-0.50%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-6.00%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	1.84%	+0.08%

Volatility

CFO vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) is 2.42%, while First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that CFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFO	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	4.05%	-1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.79%	10.55%	-2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.75%	15.00%	-4.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	18.96%	-5.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.27%	18.96%	-5.69%

CFO vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFO vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

CFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than FTIF's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF	1.24%	1.32%	1.44%	1.72%	3.95%	1.06%	0.90%	1.44%	1.49%	1.18%	1.35%	1.31%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.11%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFO and FTIF in my portfolio?

CFO and FTIF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFO or FTIF?

FTIF has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to CFO (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFO dropped -24.35% vs FTIF's -27.83%.

Which ETF is better, CFO or FTIF?

On 3-year performance, FTIF leads with 16.19% vs 10.44% for CFO. On fees, CFO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CFO has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CFO or FTIF?

Over the 3-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 16.19% return vs 10.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CFO or FTIF?

CFO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CFO or FTIF?

CFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 1.11% for FTIF.

What is the main difference between CFO and FTIF?

CFO tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CFO and 0.60% for FTIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.