CFO vs. CNAV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CFO (VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CFO is passively managed, while CNAV is actively managed. Over the past year, CFO returned 13.59% vs 72.64% for CNAV. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFO charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

CFO vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFO achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 47.26% return.

CFO

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 6M: 6.96%
• 1Y: 13.59%
• 3Y*: 10.44%
• 5Y*: 3.88%
• 10Y*: 9.36%

CNAV

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 21.60%
• YTD: 47.26%
• 6M: 48.02%
• 1Y: 72.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFO vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF	6.66%	8.60%	-0.58%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	47.26%	16.80%	6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CFO and CNAV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024	0.64

The correlation between CFO and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CFO vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFO

CFO Risk / Return Rank: 38
CFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CFO Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
CFO Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 87
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFO vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFO	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	2.91	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	3.62	-1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.48	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	5.63	-3.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.10	24.09	-16.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFO vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFO Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFO and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFO	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	2.91	-1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	1.62	-0.97

Drawdowns

CFO vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFO drawdown since its inception was -24.35%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFO and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFO	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.35%	-30.06%	+5.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.10%	-12.97%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	0.00%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-5.42%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	3.02%	-1.10%

Volatility

CFO vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) is 2.42%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that CFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFO	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	12.28%	-9.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.79%	21.02%	-13.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.75%	25.08%	-14.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	27.16%	-13.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.27%	27.16%	-13.89%

CFO vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFO vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

CFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF	1.24%	1.32%	1.44%	1.72%	3.95%	1.06%	0.90%	1.44%	1.49%	1.18%	1.35%	1.31%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFO and CNAV in my portfolio?

CFO and CNAV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFO or CNAV?

CNAV has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to CFO (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFO dropped -24.35% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, CFO or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 72.64% vs 13.59% for CFO. On fees, CFO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CFO has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CFO or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 72.64% return vs 13.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CFO or CNAV?

CFO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CFO or CNAV?

CFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between CFO and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CFO and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.