CFNB vs. LVHI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CFNB (California First Leasing Corporation) is a stock, while LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Over the past 10 years, CFNB returned -26.25%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for LVHI. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CFNB vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in California First Leasing Corporation (CFNB) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFNB achieves a -97.57% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 18.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CFNB has underperformed LVHI with an annualized return of -26.25%, while LVHI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.

CFNB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -98.00%
• 6M: -97.54%
• YTD: -97.57%
• 1Y: -96.42%
• 3Y*: -65.47%
• 5Y*: -48.35%
• 10Y*: -26.25%
• ALL TIME*: -14.47%

LVHI

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.87%
• 6M: 12.27%
• YTD: 18.07%
• 1Y: 35.95%
• 3Y*: 22.77%
• 5Y*: 16.64%
• 10Y*: 11.79%
• ALL TIME*: 11.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CFNB California First Leasing Corporation	$33.95	$30.56	$176.50K
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	$35.67M	$30.40M	$26.81M

CFNB vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFNB California First Leasing Corporation	-97.57%	18.72%	40.36%	3.72%	-10.28%	18.89%	-8.95%	17.74%	-6.11%	-3.58%
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	18.07%	27.12%	14.81%	17.45%	3.84%	18.19%	-8.76%	18.35%	-5.22%	12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CFNB and LVHI is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016	0.06

Return for Risk

CFNB vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CFNB

CFNB Risk / Return Rank: 7
CFNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CFNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CFNB Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CFNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CFNB Martin Ratio Rank: 0

LVHI

LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 97
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CFNB vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California First Leasing Corporation (CFNB) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CFNB	LVHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.94	3.87	-4.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	5.30	-5.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.75	-1.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	5.94	-6.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-4.97	24.81	-29.78

CFNB vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFNB Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFNB and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CFNB vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFNB drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFNB and LVHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFNB	LVHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.00%	-32.31%	-65.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.00%	-6.08%	-91.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.00%	-11.99%	-86.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.00%	-11.99%	-86.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.00%	-32.31%	-65.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.00%	-0.88%	-97.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.70%	-3.47%	-13.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.06%	1.45%	+17.61%

Volatility

CFNB vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

California First Leasing Corporation (CFNB) has a higher volatility of 391.20% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.09%. This indicates that CFNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFNB	LVHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	391.20%	2.09%	+389.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	391.62%	7.58%	+384.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.65%	9.35%	+94.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.10%	11.06%	+36.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.52%	13.70%	+22.82%

Dividends

CFNB vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

CFNB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFNB California First Leasing Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.07%	0.06%	0.07%	0.06%	0.06%	0.07%
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	4.52%	4.92%	3.98%	8.12%	7.74%	4.13%	3.97%	6.67%	10.67%	3.38%	2.02%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFNB and LVHI in my portfolio?

CFNB and LVHI have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFNB or LVHI?

CFNB has higher volatility (391.20%) compared to LVHI (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFNB dropped -98.00% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.