CFNB vs. USLM
CFNB (California First Leasing Corporation) and USLM (United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.) are both stocks. CFNB operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while USLM operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CFNB returned 64.30%/yr vs 25.17%/yr for USLM. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CFNB vs. USLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFNB achieves a 5,984.23% return, which is significantly higher than USLM's -13.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CFNB has outperformed USLM with an annualized return of 64.30%, while USLM has yielded a comparatively lower 25.17% annualized return.
CFNB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4,900.00%
- 6M
- 6,238.69%
- YTD
- 5,984.23%
- 1Y
- 8,834.21%
- 3Y*
- 388.14%
- 5Y*
- 149.71%
- 10Y*
- 64.30%
USLM
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- 6M
- -21.34%
- YTD
- -13.61%
- 1Y
- 1.29%
- 3Y*
- 35.48%
- 5Y*
- 30.66%
- 10Y*
- 25.17%
CFNB vs. USLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNB California First Leasing Corporation | 5,984.23% | 18.72% | 43.24% | 3.72% | -11.51% | 24.31% | -5.78% | 21.39% | -3.14% | -0.52% |
USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | -13.61% | -9.59% | 188.91% | 64.34% | 9.84% | 13.69% | 27.15% | 35.03% | -7.26% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFNB and USLM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
CFNB:
$304.85M
USLM:
$2.96B
CFNB:
$377.58
USLM:
$6.82
CFNB:
4.50
USLM:
15.14
CFNB:
0.04
USLM:
0.39
CFNB:
3.12
USLM:
5.36
CFNB:
$97.71M
USLM:
$369.31M
CFNB:
$94.08M
USLM:
$177.91M
CFNB:
$95.07M
USLM:
$185.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFNB vs. USLM — Risk / Return Rank
CFNB
USLM
CFNB vs. USLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California First Leasing Corporation (CFNB) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFNB | USLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +462.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 92.23 | 1.04 | +91.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 664.74 | 0.04 | +664.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,984.13 | 0.10 | +1,984.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFNB vs. USLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFNB drawdown since its inception was -75.57%, roughly equal to the maximum USLM drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFNB and USLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFNB | USLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.57% | -77.09% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -30.06% | +16.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.92% | -45.87% | +21.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.92% | -45.87% | +21.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.09% | -45.87% | +14.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -34.15% | +34.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.06% | -27.36% | +5.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 13.21% | -8.69% |
Volatility
CFNB vs. USLM - Volatility Comparison
California First Leasing Corporation (CFNB) has a higher volatility of 391.07% compared to United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) at 11.63%. This indicates that CFNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFNB | USLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 391.07% | 11.63% | +379.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 391.26% | 32.99% | +358.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4,909.57% | 41.05% | +4,868.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,196.62% | 36.21% | +2,160.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,554.25% | 36.52% | +1,517.73% |
Dividends
CFNB vs. USLM - Dividend Comparison
CFNB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNB California First Leasing Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% | 3.56% | 3.12% | 3.53% | 3.18% | 2.94% | 3.33% |
USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | 0.23% | 0.20% | 0.15% | 0.35% | 0.57% | 0.50% | 0.56% | 6.52% | 0.76% | 0.70% | 0.66% | 0.91% |
Financials
CFNB vs. USLM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California First Leasing Corporation and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CFNB vs. USLM - Profitability Comparison
CFNB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, California First Leasing Corporation reported a gross profit of 67.97M and revenue of 67.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
USLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.75M and revenue of 87.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.
CFNB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, California First Leasing Corporation reported an operating income of 67.05M and revenue of 67.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 98.7%.
USLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.78M and revenue of 87.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.7%.
CFNB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, California First Leasing Corporation reported a net income of 11.99M and revenue of 67.97M, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.
USLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a net income of 30.58M and revenue of 87.83M, resulting in a net margin of 34.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CFNB and USLM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CFNB has higher volatility (391.07%) compared to USLM (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFNB dropped -75.57% vs USLM's -77.09%.
CFNB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFNB and USLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer