CFNB vs. RSG
CFNB (California First Leasing Corporation) and RSG (Republic Services, Inc.) are both stocks. CFNB operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while RSG operates in Waste Management (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CFNB returned 64.30%/yr vs 17.50%/yr for RSG. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CFNB vs. RSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFNB achieves a 5,984.23% return, which is significantly higher than RSG's 6.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CFNB has outperformed RSG with an annualized return of 64.30%, while RSG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.50% annualized return.
CFNB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4,900.00%
- 6M
- 6,238.69%
- YTD
- 5,984.23%
- 1Y
- 8,834.21%
- 3Y*
- 388.14%
- 5Y*
- 149.71%
- 10Y*
- 64.30%
RSG
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- -6.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.88%
- 10Y*
- 17.50%
CFNB vs. RSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNB California First Leasing Corporation | 5,984.23% | 18.72% | 43.24% | 3.72% | -11.51% | 24.31% | -5.78% | 21.39% | -3.14% | -0.52% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 6.32% | 6.44% | 23.03% | 29.64% | -6.16% | 47.03% | 9.53% | 26.62% | 8.85% | 20.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFNB and RSG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1998 | 0.09 |
The correlation between CFNB and RSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CFNB:
$304.85M
RSG:
$68.73B
CFNB:
$377.58
RSG:
$7.00
CFNB:
4.50
RSG:
31.93
CFNB:
0.04
RSG:
2.25
CFNB:
3.12
RSG:
4.15
CFNB:
1.04
RSG:
5.76
CFNB:
$97.71M
RSG:
$16.70B
CFNB:
$94.08M
RSG:
$3.80B
CFNB:
$95.07M
RSG:
$4.89B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFNB vs. RSG — Risk / Return Rank
CFNB
RSG
CFNB vs. RSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California First Leasing Corporation (CFNB) and Republic Services, Inc. (RSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFNB | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +463.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 92.23 | 0.96 | +91.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 664.74 | -0.34 | +665.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,984.13 | -0.56 | +1,984.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFNB vs. RSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFNB drawdown since its inception was -75.57%, which is greater than RSG's maximum drawdown of -65.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFNB and RSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFNB | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.57% | -65.99% | -9.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -18.94% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.92% | -22.54% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.92% | -22.54% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.09% | -34.02% | +2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.24% | +12.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.06% | -11.84% | -10.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 11.34% | -6.82% |
Volatility
CFNB vs. RSG - Volatility Comparison
California First Leasing Corporation (CFNB) has a higher volatility of 391.07% compared to Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) at 6.69%. This indicates that CFNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFNB | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 391.07% | 6.69% | +384.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 391.26% | 14.64% | +376.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4,909.57% | 19.10% | +4,890.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,196.62% | 18.30% | +2,178.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,554.25% | 19.16% | +1,535.09% |
Dividends
CFNB vs. RSG - Dividend Comparison
CFNB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNB California First Leasing Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% | 3.56% | 3.12% | 3.53% | 3.18% | 2.94% | 3.33% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 1.12% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.74% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.17% | 2.64% |
Financials
CFNB vs. RSG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California First Leasing Corporation and Republic Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CFNB vs. RSG - Profitability Comparison
CFNB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, California First Leasing Corporation reported a gross profit of 67.97M and revenue of 67.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
RSG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CFNB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, California First Leasing Corporation reported an operating income of 67.05M and revenue of 67.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 98.7%.
RSG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
CFNB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, California First Leasing Corporation reported a net income of 11.99M and revenue of 67.97M, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.
RSG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CFNB and RSG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CFNB has higher volatility (391.07%) compared to RSG (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFNB dropped -75.57% vs RSG's -65.99%.
CFNB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFNB and RSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer