CFIHX vs. PALDX
CFIHX (American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, CFIHX returned 9.01%/yr vs 9.44%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CFIHX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.
Performance
CFIHX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFIHX achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than PALDX's 6.75% return.
CFIHX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- —
PALDX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- 1Y
- 19.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- —
CFIHX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIHX American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 | 7.57% | 20.76% | 9.78% | 9.31% | -6.86% | 15.39% | 3.52% | 17.60% | -6.77% | 2.55% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 6.75% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFIHX and PALDX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CFIHX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFIHX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
CFIHX
PALDX
CFIHX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 (CFIHX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFIHX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.44 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 3.26 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.13 | 15.11 | -3.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFIHX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFIHX drawdown since its inception was -25.26%, roughly equal to the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIHX and PALDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFIHX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.26% | -26.16% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -5.96% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.88% | -16.06% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.45% | -20.47% | +3.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -1.05% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -4.07% | +0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.28% | +0.34% |
Volatility
CFIHX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 (CFIHX) is 2.60%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that CFIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFIHX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 3.28% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | 6.76% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.27% | 8.34% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.04% | 12.17% | -2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 12.70% | -1.73% |
CFIHX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFIHX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CFIHX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
CFIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than PALDX's 5.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIHX American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 | 7.61% | 8.03% | 5.35% | 3.79% | 3.77% | 3.46% | 3.70% | 4.41% | 4.11% | 4.74% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.08% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFIHX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PALDX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to CFIHX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFIHX dropped -25.26% vs PALDX's -26.16%.
PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFIHX and PALDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer