CFA vs. USL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CFA (VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - CFA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CFA returned 11.44%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for USL. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.

Performance

CFA vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFA achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CFA has outperformed USL with an annualized return of 11.44%, while USL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.74% annualized return.

CFA

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 6.98%
• 6M: 7.87%
• 1Y: 14.73%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 7.94%
• 10Y*: 11.44%

USL

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 60.58%
• 6M: 58.21%
• 1Y: 56.66%
• 3Y*: 17.81%
• 5Y*: 17.18%
• 10Y*: 10.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFA vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF	6.98%	8.63%	15.34%	11.85%	-11.39%	26.09%	11.98%	30.15%	-8.62%	22.47%
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP	60.58%	-12.37%	8.30%	-1.11%	27.10%	62.48%	-25.23%	28.01%	-14.15%	2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CFA and USL is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014	0.22

The correlation between CFA and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CFA vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CFA	USL
Industrials	18.4%	-
Financial Services	18.3%	4.5%
Technology	14.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	-
Healthcare	9.5%	-
Utilities	9.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	-
Energy	5.5%	-
Basic Materials	3.6%	-
Communication Services	3.6%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

CFA vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFA

CFA Risk / Return Rank: 40
CFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CFA Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CFA Martin Ratio Rank: 46

USL

USL Risk / Return Rank: 56
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 53
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFA vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFA	USL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.00	-0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.54	-0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	3.67	-1.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.69	7.44	+0.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFA vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFA and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFA	USL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	2.00	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.57	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.33	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.01	+0.62

Drawdowns

CFA vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFA drawdown since its inception was -37.74%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFA and USL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFA	USL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.74%	-89.06%	+51.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-16.76%	+9.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.28%	-23.33%	+6.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.88%	-33.82%	+12.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.74%	-66.02%	+28.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-39.10%	+39.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-61.46%	+57.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	8.26%	-6.34%

Volatility

CFA vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) is 2.52%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that CFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFA	USL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	11.15%	-8.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.86%	23.30%	-15.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	28.65%	-17.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.06%	30.07%	-15.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.22%	32.35%	-15.13%

CFA vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFA vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

CFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF	1.23%	1.29%	1.32%	1.42%	1.59%	1.04%	1.21%	1.35%	1.50%	1.15%	1.37%	1.31%
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFA and USL in my portfolio?

CFA and USL have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFA or USL?

USL has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to CFA (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFA dropped -37.74% vs USL's -89.06%.

Which ETF is better, CFA or USL?

On 10-year performance, CFA leads with 11.44% vs 10.74% for USL. On fees, CFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CFA has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CFA or USL?

Over the 10-year period, CFA has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CFA or USL?

CFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CFA or USL?

CFA has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

What is the main difference between CFA and USL?

CFA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. CFA tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CFA and 0.88% for USL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.