CFA vs. CDC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC).

CFA and CDC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CFA is a passively managed fund by VictoryShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014. CDC is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014. Both CFA and CDC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CFA vs. CDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CFA vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF	0.77%	8.63%	15.34%	11.85%	-11.39%	26.09%	11.98%	30.15%	-8.62%	22.47%
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	9.03%	8.96%	14.48%	-4.99%	-7.86%	33.05%	12.88%	19.64%	-5.97%	15.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFA achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CFA has outperformed CDC with an annualized return of 11.03%, while CDC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.

CFA

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 9.82%
• 3Y*: 11.54%
• 5Y*: 7.70%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

CDC

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -2.88%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 8.89%
• 1Y: 12.52%
• 3Y*: 9.63%
• 5Y*: 6.27%
• 10Y*: 10.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFA vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.

CDC

VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF

CFA

VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF

Return for Risk

CFA vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFA

CFA Risk / Return Rank: 37
CFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CFA Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CFA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CDC

CDC Risk / Return Rank: 51
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFA vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFA	CDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	0.93	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	1.33	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.19	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	1.23	-0.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.12	4.90	-0.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFA vs. CDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFA Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the CDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFA and CDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFA	CDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	0.93	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.50	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.76	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.74	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between CFA and CDC is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CFA vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison

CFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than CDC's 3.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF	1.33%	1.29%	1.32%	1.42%	1.59%	1.04%	1.21%	1.35%	1.50%	1.15%	1.37%	1.31%
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	3.19%	3.36%	3.32%	4.24%	3.48%	2.65%	2.48%	3.04%	3.37%	2.81%	2.99%	3.17%

Drawdowns

CFA vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFA drawdown since its inception was -37.74%, which is greater than CDC's maximum drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFA and CDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFA	CDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.74%	-21.37%	-16.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.90%	-11.27%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.88%	-21.37%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.74%	-21.37%	-16.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.45%	-3.07%	-2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-5.14%	+0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	2.84%	-0.25%

Volatility

CFA vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) at 2.97%. This indicates that CFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFA	CDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	2.97%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.19%	7.03%	+1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.03%	13.63%	+2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.10%	12.56%	+2.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	13.22%	+4.01%