CFA vs. CDC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CFA (VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF) and CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CFA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index, while CDC is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CFA returned 11.44%/yr vs 10.09%/yr for CDC. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for CDC.

Performance

CFA vs. CDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFA achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CFA has outperformed CDC with an annualized return of 11.44%, while CDC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.09% annualized return.

CFA

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 6.98%
• 6M: 7.87%
• 1Y: 14.73%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 7.94%
• 10Y*: 11.44%

CDC

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: 11.20%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 19.16%
• 3Y*: 12.19%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: 10.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFA vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF	6.98%	8.63%	15.34%	11.85%	-11.39%	26.09%	11.98%	30.15%	-8.62%	22.47%
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	11.20%	8.96%	14.48%	-4.99%	-7.86%	33.05%	12.88%	19.64%	-5.97%	15.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CFA and CDC is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014	0.80

The correlation between CFA and CDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

CFA vs. CDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CFA	CDC
Industrials	18.4%	2.3%
Financial Services	18.3%	23.4%
Technology	14.9%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	6.6%
Healthcare	9.5%	6.8%
Utilities	9.0%	24.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	15.9%
Energy	5.5%	9.5%
Basic Materials	3.6%	0.0%
Communication Services	3.6%	4.4%
Real Estate	0.5%	0.0%

Return for Risk

CFA vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFA

CFA Risk / Return Rank: 40
CFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CFA Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CFA Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CDC

CDC Risk / Return Rank: 61
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFA vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFA	CDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.97	-0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.93	-0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.34	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	3.44	-1.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.69	12.19	-4.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFA vs. CDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the CDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFA and CDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFA	CDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	1.97	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.42	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.77	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.75	-0.13

Drawdowns

CFA vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFA drawdown since its inception was -37.74%, which is greater than CDC's maximum drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFA and CDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFA	CDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.74%	-21.37%	-16.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-5.67%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.28%	-12.70%	-4.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.88%	-21.37%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.74%	-21.37%	-16.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.65%	+1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-5.10%	+0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	1.60%	+0.32%

Volatility

CFA vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) is 2.52%, while VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that CFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFA	CDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	2.80%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.86%	6.90%	+0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	9.75%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.06%	12.54%	+2.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.22%	13.21%	+4.01%

CFA vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFA vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison

CFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than CDC's 3.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	3.16%	3.36%	3.32%	4.24%	3.48%	2.65%	2.48%	3.04%	3.37%	2.81%	2.99%	3.17%
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF	1.23%	1.29%	1.32%	1.42%	1.59%	1.04%	1.21%	1.35%	1.50%	1.15%	1.37%	1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFA and CDC in my portfolio?

CFA and CDC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFA or CDC?

CDC has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to CFA (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFA dropped -37.74% vs CDC's -21.37%.

Which ETF is better, CFA or CDC?

On 10-year performance, CFA leads with 11.44% vs 10.09% for CDC. On fees, CFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CFA has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CFA or CDC?

Over the 10-year period, CFA has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 10.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CFA or CDC?

CFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CFA or CDC?

CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.16%, compared with 1.23% for CFA.

What is the main difference between CFA and CDC?

CFA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CDC is Large Cap Value Equities. CFA tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index, while CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CFA and 0.37% for CDC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.