PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFA vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFA vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFA achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CFA has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 11.44%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


CFA

1D
0.49%
1M
1.35%
YTD
6.98%
6M
7.87%
1Y
14.73%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
11.44%

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFA vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFA
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF
6.98%8.63%15.34%11.85%-11.39%26.09%11.98%30.15%-8.62%22.47%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CFA and SPY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014

0.86

The correlation between CFA and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CFA vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CFA
SPY

Industrials

18.4%
7.8%

Financial Services

18.3%
11.8%

Technology

14.9%
35.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.3%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.4%

Utilities

9.0%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
4.8%

Energy

5.5%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.8%

Communication Services

3.6%
11.3%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.9%

Industrials

CFA
18.4%
SPY
7.8%

Financial Services

CFA
18.3%
SPY
11.8%

Technology

CFA
14.9%
SPY
35.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CFA
9.8%
SPY
10.3%

Healthcare

CFA
9.5%
SPY
8.4%

Utilities

CFA
9.0%
SPY
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

CFA
6.8%
SPY
4.8%

Energy

CFA
5.5%
SPY
3.6%

Basic Materials

CFA
3.6%
SPY
1.8%

Communication Services

CFA
3.6%
SPY
11.3%

Real Estate

CFA
0.5%
SPY
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFA vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFA
CFA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFA vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFASPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

2.38

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

3.24

-1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.16

-1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.69

14.72

-7.03

CFA vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFA and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFASPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.38

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.82

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.87

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.59

+0.04

Drawdowns

CFA vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFA drawdown since its inception was -37.74%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFA and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFASPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.74%

-55.19%

+17.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-8.88%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.28%

-18.76%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.88%

-24.50%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.74%

-33.72%

-4.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-9.05%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.91%

+0.01%

Volatility

CFA vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) is 2.52%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that CFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFASPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.84%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

8.90%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

11.83%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.06%

17.05%

-1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

17.94%

-0.72%

CFA vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFA vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

CFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFA
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF
1.23%1.29%1.32%1.42%1.59%1.04%1.21%1.35%1.50%1.15%1.37%1.31%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFA and SPY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to CFA (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFA dropped -37.74% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 11.44% for CFA. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CFA has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CFA.

CFA has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.

CFA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. CFA tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CFA and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFA and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer