CFA vs. SPY
CFA (VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CFA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CFA returned 11.41%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
CFA vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFA achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CFA has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 11.41%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.
CFA
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 13.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
CFA vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF | 6.66% | 8.63% | 15.34% | 11.85% | -11.39% | 26.09% | 11.98% | 30.15% | -8.62% | 22.47% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFA and SPY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014 | 0.86 |
The correlation between CFA and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CFA vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CFA
SPY
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
CFA
SPY
Financial Services
CFA
SPY
Technology
CFA
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
CFA
SPY
Healthcare
CFA
SPY
Utilities
CFA
SPY
Consumer Defensive
CFA
SPY
Energy
CFA
SPY
Basic Materials
CFA
SPY
Communication Services
CFA
SPY
Real Estate
CFA
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFA vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
CFA
SPY
CFA vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFA | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.43 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 3.16 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 14.72 | -7.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFA | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 2.38 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.82 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.87 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.59 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
CFA vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFA drawdown since its inception was -37.74%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFA and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFA | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.74% | -55.19% | +17.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -8.88% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.28% | -18.76% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.88% | -24.50% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.74% | -33.72% | -4.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.70% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -9.05% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.91% | +0.01% |
Volatility
CFA vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) is 2.40%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that CFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFA | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 2.84% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.82% | 8.90% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 11.83% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 17.05% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 17.94% | -0.73% |
CFA vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFA vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
CFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF | 1.24% | 1.29% | 1.32% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.15% | 1.37% | 1.31% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFA and SPY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to CFA (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFA dropped -37.74% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 11.41% for CFA. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CFA has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 11.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CFA.
CFA has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.
CFA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. CFA tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CFA and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFA and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer