PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CERY vs. GC=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CERY vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and Gold Futures (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CERY

1D
-1.20%
1M
-9.49%
YTD
18.11%
6M
16.37%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GC=F

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CERY vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CERY
SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
18.11%15.68%3.80%
GC=F
Gold Futures
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CERY vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CERY
CERY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

GC=F

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CERY vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CERYGC=FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

CERY vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CERY vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CERYGC=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

Volatility

CERY vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CERYGC=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.74%

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CERY and GC=F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer