CEPI vs. RYLD

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. CEPI is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, CEPI returned 21.57% vs 24.71% for RYLD. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CEPI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

CEPI vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEPI achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 14.18% return.

CEPI

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 2.09%
• 6M: 17.67%
• YTD: 18.92%
• 1Y: 21.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.94%

RYLD

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 2.90%
• 6M: 11.01%
• YTD: 14.18%
• 1Y: 24.71%
• 3Y*: 8.92%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF	$1.24M	$1.26M	$1.60M
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	$10.56M	$9.60M	$9.13M

CEPI vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF	18.92%	10.75%	-7.02%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	14.18%	5.65%	-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CEPI and RYLD is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.73

The correlation between CEPI and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CEPI vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CEPI

CEPI Risk / Return Rank: 28
CEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 26

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 90
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CEPI vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEPI	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	2.38	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	3.34	-2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.50	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	3.94	-2.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.24	16.16	-13.92

CEPI vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEPI Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEPI and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CEPI vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEPI drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEPI and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEPI	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.48%	-41.53%	+12.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.47%	-6.29%	-16.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.56%	0.00%	-4.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.22%	-8.64%	+0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.65%	1.53%	+8.12%

Volatility

CEPI vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.34%. This indicates that CEPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEPI	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.17%	2.34%	+8.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.73%	7.72%	+16.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.34%	10.57%	+18.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.88%	13.98%	+17.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.88%	17.04%	+14.84%

CEPI vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEPI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEPI vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.15%, more than RYLD's 11.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF	44.15%	50.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.43%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEPI and RYLD in my portfolio?

CEPI and RYLD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CEPI or RYLD?

CEPI has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to RYLD (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEPI dropped -29.48% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, CEPI or RYLD?

On 1-year performance, RYLD leads with 24.71% vs 21.57% for CEPI. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CEPI or RYLD?

Over the 1-year period, RYLD has performed better with a 24.71% return vs 21.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEPI or RYLD?

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CEPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CEPI or RYLD?

CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 44.15%, compared with 11.43% for RYLD.

What is the main difference between CEPI and RYLD?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CEPI and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.