CEPI vs. LFGY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) and LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CEPI returned 20.69% vs -0.86% for LFGY. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CEPI charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for LFGY.

Performance

CEPI vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEPI achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly higher than LFGY's 6.34% return.

CEPI

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -1.15%
• 6M: 12.02%
• YTD: 15.15%
• 1Y: 20.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.85%

LFGY

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.38%
• 6M: 5.38%
• YTD: 6.34%
• 1Y: -0.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF	$1.21M	$1.33M	$1.59M
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	$957.02K	$905.59K	$1.33M

CEPI vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF	15.15%	7.55%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	6.34%	-9.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CEPI and LFGY is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025	0.90

The correlation between CEPI and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CEPI vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CEPI

CEPI Risk / Return Rank: 24
CEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 23

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 9
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CEPI vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEPI	LFGY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	-0.15	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	0.07	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.01	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	-0.17	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.66	-0.36	+2.01

CEPI vs. LFGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEPI Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the LFGY Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEPI and LFGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CEPI vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEPI drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum LFGY drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEPI and LFGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEPI	LFGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.48%	-35.94%	+6.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.47%	-35.94%	+13.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.59%	-18.77%	+11.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.24%	-14.12%	+5.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.65%	17.27%	-7.62%

Volatility

CEPI vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) is 11.58%, while YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a volatility of 14.26%. This indicates that CEPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEPI	LFGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.58%	14.26%	-2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.76%	33.33%	-9.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.53%	40.62%	-11.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.91%	42.60%	-10.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.91%	42.60%	-10.69%

CEPI vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEPI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than LFGY's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEPI vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.59%, less than LFGY's 85.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF	45.59%	50.78%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	85.75%	94.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEPI and LFGY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, CEPI and LFGY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CEPI or LFGY?

LFGY has higher volatility (14.26%) compared to CEPI (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEPI dropped -29.48% vs LFGY's -35.94%.

Which ETF is better, CEPI or LFGY?

On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 20.69% vs -0.86% for LFGY. On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, CEPI has been the lower-risk option at 11.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CEPI or LFGY?

Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 20.69% return vs -0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEPI or LFGY?

CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CEPI or LFGY?

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 85.75%, compared with 45.59% for CEPI.

What is the main difference between CEPI and LFGY?

They also come from different issuers: REX and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CEPI and 1.02% for LFGY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.