PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CELT vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CELT vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CELT

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOG

1D
-12.13%
1M
10.59%
YTD
-60.40%
6M
-72.73%
1Y
-29.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CELT
Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF
-19.49%-56.51%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
-60.40%-52.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CELT and HOOG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CELT vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CELT

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CELT vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CELT vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CELTHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

Drawdowns

CELT vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CELTHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.22%

Volatility

CELT vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CELTHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

100.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.88%

CELT vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CELT vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

CELT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.07%.


PositionTTM2025
CELT
Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
31.07%12.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


CELT and HOOG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.07%, compared with 0.00% for CELT.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.75% for HOOG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CELT and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer