CELT vs. HOOG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.

Performance

CELT vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CELT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOG

• 1D: -4.87%
• 1M: 83.12%
• YTD: -40.69%
• 6M: -48.04%
• 1Y: -5.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	-19.49%	-55.03%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-40.69%	-48.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CELT and HOOG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

CELT vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CELT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 12
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CELT vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CELT	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.04	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.99	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.12	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.09	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CELT	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-86.94%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-86.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-72.34%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-39.04%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	55.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CELT	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	46.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	101.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	139.38%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	144.74%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	144.74%	—

CELT vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CELT vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

CELT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.75%.

Position	TTM	2025
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	20.75%	12.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CELT and HOOG in my portfolio?

CELT and HOOG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CELT or HOOG?

On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CELT or HOOG?

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CELT or HOOG?

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 20.75%, compared with 0.00% for CELT.

What is the main difference between CELT and HOOG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.75% for HOOG.