CELT vs. CLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and CLSX (Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr ETFs. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

CELT vs. CLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CELT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLSX

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 77.73%
• YTD: 96.48%
• 6M: -11.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. CLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	-19.49%	-56.51%
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF	96.48%	-79.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CELT and CLSX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

CELT vs. CLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CELT	CLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.06	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CELT	CLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-93.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-72.16%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-69.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CELT	CLSX	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	192.67%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	192.67%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	192.67%	—

CELT vs. CLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CELT and CLSX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

CELT vs. CLSX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CELT nor CLSX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CELT and CLSX in my portfolio?

CELT and CLSX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CELT or CLSX?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CELT or CLSX?

CELT and CLSX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CELT or CLSX?

CELT and CLSX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.