PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CELT vs. INTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CELT vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CELT

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INTW

1D
8.89%
1M
29.41%
YTD
562.71%
6M
361.23%
1Y
1,617.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CELT
Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF
-19.49%-56.51%
INTW
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF
562.71%-10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CELT and INTW is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CELT vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CELT

INTW
INTW Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CELT vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CELT vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CELTINTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.39

Drawdowns

CELT vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CELTINTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.05%

Volatility

CELT vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CELTINTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

111.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

143.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.22%

CELT vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CELT vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither CELT nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CELT and INTW have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CELT is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CELT is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

CELT and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 1.50% for INTW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CELT and INTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer