CELT vs. INTW
CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
CELT vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CELT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- 8.89%
- 1M
- 29.41%
- YTD
- 562.71%
- 6M
- 361.23%
- 1Y
- 1,617.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CELT vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF | -19.49% | -56.51% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 562.71% | -10.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELT and INTW is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELT vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
CELT
INTW
CELT vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CELT | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 3.39 | — |
Drawdowns
CELT vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELT | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -60.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -26.69% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -30.07% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.05% | — |
Volatility
CELT vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELT | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 48.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 111.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 143.36% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 145.22% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 145.22% | — |
CELT vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CELT vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither CELT nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CELT and INTW have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CELT is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CELT is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
CELT and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 1.50% for INTW.
Find the right allocation for CELT and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer