CELH vs. LSCC
CELH (Celsius Holdings, Inc.) and LSCC (Lattice Semiconductor Corporation) are both stocks. CELH operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while LSCC operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CELH returned 44.26%/yr vs 35.59%/yr for LSCC. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CELH vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CELH achieves a -36.27% return, which is significantly lower than LSCC's 74.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CELH has outperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 44.26%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 35.59% annualized return.
CELH
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -11.77%
- 6M
- -40.87%
- YTD
- -36.27%
- 1Y
- -31.80%
- 3Y*
- -15.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 44.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 43.31%
LSCC
- 1D
- -7.02%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- 6M
- 56.88%
- YTD
- 74.38%
- 1Y
- 128.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.84%
- 10Y*
- 35.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $239.21M | $233.27M | $275.84M | |
| $298.03M | $248.98M | $285.29M |
CELH vs. LSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | -36.27% | 73.65% | -51.69% | 57.21% | 39.52% | 48.22% | 941.61% | 39.19% | -33.90% | 114.29% |
LSCC Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 74.38% | 29.89% | -17.89% | 6.33% | -15.81% | 68.18% | 139.39% | 176.59% | 19.72% | -21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELH and LSCC is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CELH and LSCC has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CELH:
$7.45B
LSCC:
$17.58B
CELH:
$0.61
LSCC:
$0.26
CELH:
47.98
LSCC:
489.43
CELH:
2.40
LSCC:
27.30
CELH:
19.01
LSCC:
23.51
CELH:
$2.97B
LSCC:
$651.12M
CELH:
$1.47B
LSCC:
$440.51M
CELH:
$274.27M
LSCC:
$66.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELH vs. LSCC — Risk / Return Rank
CELH
LSCC
CELH vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CELH | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.35 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 4.75 | -5.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 15.39 | -16.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CELH vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CELH drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, smaller than the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELH and LSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELH | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.86% | -97.34% | +19.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.19% | -27.25% | -30.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.86% | -61.09% | -16.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.86% | -61.09% | -16.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.86% | -61.09% | -16.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.67% | -17.36% | -52.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.48% | -54.95% | +26.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.48% | 8.38% | +28.10% |
Volatility
CELH vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) is 12.99%, while Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a volatility of 22.92%. This indicates that CELH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELH | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 22.92% | -9.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.43% | 49.70% | -10.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.57% | 60.66% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.45% | 55.56% | +9.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.02% | 51.24% | +17.78% |
Dividends
CELH vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison
Neither CELH nor LSCC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CELH vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CELH vs. LSCC - Profitability Comparison
CELH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 378.07M and revenue of 782.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.
LSCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 141.33M and revenue of 201.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.3%.
CELH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 138.99M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.
LSCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 21.75M and revenue of 201.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.
CELH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celsius Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 85.08M and revenue of 782.62M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
LSCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 19.36M and revenue of 201.08M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CELH and LSCC have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSCC has higher volatility (22.92%) compared to CELH (12.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CELH dropped -77.86% vs LSCC's -97.34%.
LSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CELH and LSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer