CEG vs. CCJ
CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. CEG operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 3 years, CEG returned 40.69%/yr vs 36.00%/yr for CCJ. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CEG vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEG achieves a -25.41% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's -5.59% return.
CEG
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 11.10%
- 6M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -25.41%
- 1Y
- -24.07%
- 3Y*
- 40.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.86%
CCJ
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -11.31%
- 6M
- -29.99%
- YTD
- -5.59%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 36.00%
- 5Y*
- 37.49%
- 10Y*
- 25.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $353.80M | $350.26M | $354.16M | |
| $725.89M | $725.77M | $982.35M |
CEG vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | -25.41% | 58.80% | 92.71% | 37.24% | 73.87% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | -5.59% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 12.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEG and CCJ is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022 | 0.39 |
Fundamentals
CEG:
$94.35B
CCJ:
$37.62B
CEG:
$8.04
CCJ:
CA$1.49
CEG:
32.66
CCJ:
81.00
CEG:
0.57
CCJ:
0.68
CEG:
3.47
CCJ:
14.89
CEG:
2.78
CCJ:
7.44
CEG:
$24.82B
CCJ:
CA$3.54B
CEG:
$20.98B
CCJ:
CA$1.04B
CEG:
$5.87B
CCJ:
CA$996.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEG vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
CEG
CCJ
CEG vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEG | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.10 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.42 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 0.98 | -2.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEG vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEG drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEG and CCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEG | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.70% | -87.53% | +36.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.22% | -36.93% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.70% | -40.01% | -10.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.69% | -35.58% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -46.00% | +33.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.25% | 15.91% | +7.34% |
Volatility
CEG vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) is 9.71%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 11.91%. This indicates that CEG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEG | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 11.91% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.35% | 39.28% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.84% | 55.93% | -9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.04% | 49.93% | -0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.04% | 46.76% | +2.28% |
Dividends
CEG vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than CCJ's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.20% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | 0.62% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CEG vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Energy Corp and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CEG vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison
CEG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 6.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
CCJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.
CEG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported an operating income of 598.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
CCJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
CEG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
CCJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEG and CCJ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCJ has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to CEG (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEG dropped -50.70% vs CCJ's -87.53%.
CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEG and CCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer