PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEFA vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEFA vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFA achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return.


CEFA

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.62%
YTD
7.81%
6M
9.59%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEFA vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
7.81%26.46%5.03%17.40%-16.66%7.97%21.61%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%27.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CEFA and VTI is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020

0.65

The correlation between CEFA and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CEFA vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CEFA
VTI

Financial Services

26.1%
12.0%

Industrials

19.2%
9.8%

Technology

10.7%
33.5%

Healthcare

10.6%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
4.7%

Basic Materials

5.7%
2.0%

Energy

4.4%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.6%
10.3%

Utilities

3.2%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.4%

Financial Services

CEFA
26.1%
VTI
12.0%

Industrials

CEFA
19.2%
VTI
9.8%

Technology

CEFA
10.7%
VTI
33.5%

Healthcare

CEFA
10.6%
VTI
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CEFA
8.7%
VTI
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

CEFA
6.7%
VTI
4.7%

Basic Materials

CEFA
5.7%
VTI
2.0%

Energy

CEFA
4.4%
VTI
3.7%

Communication Services

CEFA
3.6%
VTI
10.3%

Utilities

CEFA
3.2%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

CEFA
1.3%
VTI
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEFA vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFA
CEFA Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEFA vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEFAVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

2.33

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

3.18

-1.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.42

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.17

-1.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.54

14.62

-8.09

CEFA vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFA and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEFAVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.33

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.73

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.51

+0.13

Drawdowns

CEFA vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFA and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEFAVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-55.45%

+23.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-8.92%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-19.30%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-25.36%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-0.72%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-8.03%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

1.93%

+1.20%

Volatility

CEFA vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that CEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEFAVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

2.96%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

9.13%

+3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

12.17%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

17.40%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

18.30%

-1.09%

CEFA vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEFA vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

CEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
2.65%2.86%3.26%2.35%2.35%3.49%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEFA and VTI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEFA has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFA dropped -31.97% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.69% vs 6.64% for CEFA. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CEFA.

CEFA has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

CEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. CEFA tracks S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CEFA and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEFA and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer