CEFA vs. RODM
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM).
CEFA and RODM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEFA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2020. RODM is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. Both CEFA and RODM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEFA vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEFA vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF | -0.12% | 26.46% | 5.03% | 17.40% | -16.66% | 7.97% | 21.61% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 6.61% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | 17.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFA achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 6.61% return.
CEFA
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 13.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- —
RODM
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEFA vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEFA vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
CEFA
RODM
CEFA vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEFA | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 2.36 | -1.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 3.08 | -2.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.48 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 3.29 | -2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | 15.59 | -10.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFA | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 2.36 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.74 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.50 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFA and RODM is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CEFA vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
CEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than RODM's 2.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.26% | 2.35% | 2.35% | 3.49% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.92% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Drawdowns
CEFA vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFA and RODM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFA | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.97% | -35.98% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -9.40% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -28.85% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.72% | -4.11% | -4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -6.47% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 1.98% | +1.63% |
Volatility
CEFA vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 5.36%. This indicates that CEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEFA | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.91% | 5.36% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 7.91% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.99% | 13.37% | +5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 13.42% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 15.21% | +1.93% |