CEBG.DE vs. CHIN.DE
CEBG.DE (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) and CHIN.DE (KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD) are both China Equities funds - CEBG.DE tracks the MarketGrader New China ESG while CHIN.DE tracks the S&P China 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CEBG.DE returned 32.71% vs 26.49% for CHIN.DE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEBG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CHIN.DE.
Performance
CEBG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBG.DE achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than CHIN.DE's 6.22% return.
CEBG.DE
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEBG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 11.81% | 38.75% | -22.52% | 19.25% |
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 6.22% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBG.DE and CHIN.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2023 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBG.DE vs. CHIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBG.DE
CHIN.DE
CEBG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBG.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 3.02 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 8.15 | +2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBG.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.57 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.64 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
CEBG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBG.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, which is greater than CHIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBG.DE and CHIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBG.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.49% | -22.95% | -30.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -8.84% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -3.48% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.04% | -7.69% | -7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.29% | -0.31% |
Volatility
CEBG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) at 6.18%. This indicates that CEBG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBG.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 6.18% | +1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 12.00% | +4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.05% | 17.09% | +2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 22.41% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 22.41% | +1.77% |
CEBG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CHIN.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBG.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBG.DE nor CHIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBG.DE and CHIN.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHIN.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEBG.DE.
CEBG.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG, while CHIN.DE tracks S&P China 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEBG.DE and 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBG.DE and CHIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer