CEBG.DE vs. XCS7.DE
CEBG.DE (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) and XCS7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D) are both China Equities funds - CEBG.DE tracks the MarketGrader New China ESG while XCS7.DE tracks the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CEBG.DE returned 9.54%/yr vs 7.69%/yr for XCS7.DE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEBG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for XCS7.DE.
Performance
CEBG.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBG.DE achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than XCS7.DE's -6.89% return.
CEBG.DE
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 16.61%
- 1Y
- 32.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
XCS7.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEBG.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 11.81% | 38.75% | -22.52% | 33.05% | -0.60% |
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | -6.89% | 16.53% | 27.49% | -14.73% | 4.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBG.DE and XCS7.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBG.DE vs. XCS7.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBG.DE
XCS7.DE
CEBG.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBG.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.04 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 0.16 | +2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 0.34 | +10.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBG.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.15 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.20 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
CEBG.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBG.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, which is greater than XCS7.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBG.DE and XCS7.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBG.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.49% | -36.62% | -16.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -17.01% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.41% | -24.53% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -14.97% | +10.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.04% | -15.59% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 8.18% | -5.20% |
Volatility
CEBG.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) at 7.33%. This indicates that CEBG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCS7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBG.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 7.33% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 13.19% | +3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.05% | 18.48% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 25.65% | -4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 25.65% | -1.47% |
CEBG.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XCS7.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBG.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEBG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | 2.11% | 2.35% | 2.05% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBG.DE and XCS7.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCS7.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCS7.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEBG.DE.
CEBG.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG, while XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEBG.DE and 0.28% for XCS7.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBG.DE and XCS7.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer