PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHIN.DE vs. JPPHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CHIN.DE vs. JPPHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) and Japan Post Holdings Co Ltd ADR (JPPHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CHIN.DE vs. JPPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CHIN.DE
KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD
-1.56%16.60%23.10%-6.61%
JPPHY
Japan Post Holdings Co Ltd ADR
8.30%-3.89%20.85%-2.14%
Different Trading Currencies

CHIN.DE is traded in EUR, while JPPHY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JPPHY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHIN.DE achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than JPPHY's 8.30% return.


CHIN.DE

1D
-0.52%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
-4.29%
1Y
12.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JPPHY

1D
-11.70%
1M
-6.35%
YTD
8.30%
6M
16.16%
1Y
-2.43%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHIN.DE vs. JPPHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHIN.DE
CHIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CHIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CHIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

JPPHY
JPPHY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
JPPHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPPHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPPHY Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
JPPHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPPHY Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHIN.DE vs. JPPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) and Japan Post Holdings Co Ltd ADR (JPPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHIN.DEJPPHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

-0.04

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.00

0.38

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.07

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

-0.09

+1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.90

-0.15

+5.05

CHIN.DE vs. JPPHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the JPPHY Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHIN.DE and JPPHY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHIN.DEJPPHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

-0.04

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.02

+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between CHIN.DE and JPPHY is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CHIN.DE vs. JPPHY - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHIN.DE nor JPPHY has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
CHIN.DE
KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPPHY
Japan Post Holdings Co Ltd ADR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.35%

Drawdowns

CHIN.DE vs. JPPHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, smaller than the maximum JPPHY drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIN.DE and JPPHY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CHIN.DEJPPHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.95%

-37.81%

+14.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-26.67%

+16.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.05%

-25.07%

+18.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-20.51%

+12.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

14.24%

-10.82%

Volatility

CHIN.DE vs. JPPHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) is 5.27%, while Japan Post Holdings Co Ltd ADR (JPPHY) has a volatility of 31.29%. This indicates that CHIN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPPHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CHIN.DEJPPHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

31.29%

-26.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

48.88%

-36.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.88%

59.33%

-40.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.59%

38.08%

-15.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.59%

38.15%

-15.56%