CEBG.DE vs. RQFI.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE).

CEBG.DE and RQFI.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEBG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MarketGrader New China ESG. It was launched on Aug 25, 2010. RQFI.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jan 8, 2014. Both CEBG.DE and RQFI.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CEBG.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CEBG.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A	10.05%	38.75%	-22.52%	33.05%	5.85%	26.86%	-10.03%	15.73%	-10.56%	-0.89%
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D	0.32%	11.14%	22.25%	-16.68%	-21.96%	7.77%	24.32%	37.46%	-24.88%	16.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEBG.DE achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly higher than RQFI.DE's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBG.DE has outperformed RQFI.DE with an annualized return of 6.02%, while RQFI.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.07% annualized return.

CEBG.DE

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: -2.70%
• YTD: 10.05%
• 6M: 18.76%
• 1Y: 45.40%
• 3Y*: 10.34%
• 5Y*: 14.73%
• 10Y*: 6.02%

RQFI.DE

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -2.90%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 17.00%
• 3Y*: 3.21%
• 5Y*: -1.59%
• 10Y*: 4.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEBG.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEBG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RQFI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.

RQFI.DE

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D

CEBG.DE

VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A

Return for Risk

CEBG.DE vs. RQFI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEBG.DE

CEBG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 89
CEBG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CEBG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CEBG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CEBG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CEBG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 90

RQFI.DE

RQFI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 58
RQFI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RQFI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RQFI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RQFI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RQFI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEBG.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CEBG.DE	RQFI.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.04	+0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	1.47	+1.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.20	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	2.28	+1.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.03	6.41	+6.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CEBG.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEBG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the RQFI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEBG.DE and RQFI.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CEBG.DE	RQFI.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	1.04	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	-0.07	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.18	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.28	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between CEBG.DE and RQFI.DE is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CEBG.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Dividend Comparison

CEBG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D	1.58%	1.84%	1.40%	1.98%	1.97%	0.90%	1.32%	0.75%	2.31%	2.00%	1.81%	0.37%

Drawdowns

CEBG.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEBG.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, roughly equal to the maximum RQFI.DE drawdown of -51.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBG.DE and RQFI.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEBG.DE	RQFI.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.49%	-51.79%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.76%	-10.74%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.41%	-41.44%	+11.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.60%	-45.24%	-4.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.98%	-19.86%	+15.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.17%	-27.23%	+12.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	2.76%	+0.71%

Volatility

CEBG.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) at 4.73%. This indicates that CEBG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RQFI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEBG.DE	RQFI.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.38%	4.73%	+4.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.72%	11.12%	+4.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.29%	16.23%	+6.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.86%	20.98%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.12%	21.88%	+2.24%