CEBG.DE vs. LCHI.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Acc (LCHI.DE).
CEBG.DE and LCHI.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEBG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MarketGrader New China ESG. It was launched on Aug 25, 2010. LCHI.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders. It was launched on Feb 21, 2019. Both CEBG.DE and LCHI.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEBG.DE vs. LCHI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEBG.DE vs. LCHI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 10.05% | 38.75% | -22.52% | 33.05% | 5.85% | 26.86% | -10.03% | 15.73% | -10.56% | -0.89% |
LCHI.DE Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Acc | -7.02% | 21.51% | 20.39% | -16.01% | -18.45% | -19.46% | -11.07% | 17.62% | -8.07% | 11.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBG.DE achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly higher than LCHI.DE's -7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBG.DE has outperformed LCHI.DE with an annualized return of 6.02%, while LCHI.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.59% annualized return.
CEBG.DE
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- 45.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
LCHI.DE
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -14.23%
- 1Y
- -2.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- -7.20%
- 10Y*
- -0.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEBG.DE vs. LCHI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than LCHI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEBG.DE vs. LCHI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBG.DE
LCHI.DE
CEBG.DE vs. LCHI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Acc (LCHI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBG.DE | LCHI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | -0.09 | +2.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 0.03 | +2.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.00 | +0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | -0.03 | +3.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.03 | -0.06 | +13.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBG.DE | LCHI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | -0.09 | +2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | -0.25 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | -0.02 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.09 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBG.DE and LCHI.DE is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CEBG.DE vs. LCHI.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBG.DE nor LCHI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEBG.DE vs. LCHI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBG.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, smaller than the maximum LCHI.DE drawdown of -70.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBG.DE and LCHI.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBG.DE | LCHI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.49% | -70.36% | +16.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -17.13% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -54.83% | +24.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.60% | -58.24% | +8.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.98% | -45.78% | +41.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -35.35% | +20.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 7.31% | -3.84% |
Volatility
CEBG.DE vs. LCHI.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Acc (LCHI.DE) at 6.27%. This indicates that CEBG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCHI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEBG.DE | LCHI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 6.27% | +3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 14.22% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.29% | 22.71% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 28.90% | -8.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 25.31% | -1.19% |