CHIN.DE vs. AAAU
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU).
CHIN.DE and AAAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHIN.DE is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the S&P China 500 Index. It was launched on Oct 16, 2023. AAAU is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jul 26, 2018. Both CHIN.DE and AAAU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CHIN.DE vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHIN.DE vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | -1.05% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -6.61% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 12.18% | 44.59% | 35.29% | 2.83% |
Different Trading Currencies
CHIN.DE is traded in EUR, while AAAU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAAU values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIN.DE achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 12.18% return.
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- -2.53%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAAU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 25.17%
- 1Y
- 42.53%
- 3Y*
- 31.03%
- 5Y*
- 22.71%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHIN.DE vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIN.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHIN.DE vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank
CHIN.DE
AAAU
CHIN.DE vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHIN.DE | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 1.68 | -1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 2.13 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.47 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 8.53 | -4.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHIN.DE | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.68 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.25 | -0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIN.DE and AAAU is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CHIN.DE vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHIN.DE nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CHIN.DE vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIN.DE and AAAU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIN.DE | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -21.63% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.06% | -19.13% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.57% | -13.38% | +6.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -6.01% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 5.28% | -1.50% |
Volatility
CHIN.DE vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) is 5.38%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 10.50%. This indicates that CHIN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHIN.DE | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 10.50% | -5.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 23.05% | -10.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 25.48% | -6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 16.36% | +6.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 15.78% | +6.82% |