CEBG.DE vs. 9W1A.DE
CEBG.DE (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) and 9W1A.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both China Equities funds - CEBG.DE tracks the MarketGrader New China ESG while 9W1A.DE tracks the MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CEBG.DE returned 9.54%/yr vs 6.79%/yr for 9W1A.DE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEBG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for 9W1A.DE.
Performance
CEBG.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CEBG.DE is traded in EUR, while 9W1A.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 9W1A.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBG.DE achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than 9W1A.DE's -7.08% return.
CEBG.DE
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
9W1A.DE
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -3.59%
- YTD
- -7.08%
- 6M
- -9.31%
- 1Y
- 2.00%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEBG.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 11.81% | 38.75% | -22.52% | 33.05% | 5.85% | 9.74% |
9W1A.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc | -7.08% | 16.00% | 22.66% | -16.84% | -23.09% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBG.DE and 9W1A.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBG.DE vs. 9W1A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBG.DE
9W1A.DE
CEBG.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBG.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.04 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 0.14 | +2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 0.29 | +10.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBG.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.12 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | -0.11 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
CEBG.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBG.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, which is greater than 9W1A.DE's maximum drawdown of -50.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBG.DE and 9W1A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBG.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.49% | -50.46% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -16.74% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.41% | -27.29% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -25.27% | +20.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.04% | -27.20% | +12.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 8.13% | -5.15% |
Volatility
CEBG.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) have volatilities of 7.80% and 7.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBG.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 7.43% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 14.13% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.05% | 19.82% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 29.40% | -8.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 29.40% | -5.22% |
CEBG.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 9W1A.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBG.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBG.DE nor 9W1A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBG.DE and 9W1A.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 9W1A.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
9W1A.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEBG.DE.
CEBG.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG, while 9W1A.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEBG.DE and 0.31% for 9W1A.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBG.DE and 9W1A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer