CDUAF vs. GWW
CDUAF (Canadian Utilities Limited) and GWW (W.W. Grainger, Inc.) are both stocks. CDUAF operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while GWW operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CDUAF returned 7.23%/yr vs 21.17%/yr for GWW. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CDUAF vs. GWW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDUAF achieves a 18.48% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 29.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CDUAF has underperformed GWW with an annualized return of 7.23%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively higher 21.17% annualized return.
CDUAF
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 18.48%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- 1Y
- 36.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.62%
- 10Y*
- 7.23%
GWW
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 29.79%
- 6M
- 36.56%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.74%
- 5Y*
- 24.53%
- 10Y*
- 21.17%
CDUAF vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDUAF Canadian Utilities Limited | 18.48% | 35.10% | 6.34% | -6.25% | -1.87% | 25.16% | -14.69% | 37.49% | -19.67% | 15.55% |
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 29.79% | -3.41% | 28.21% | 50.53% | 8.75% | 28.80% | 22.85% | 22.25% | 21.69% | 4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDUAF and GWW is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2007 | 0.11 |
The correlation between CDUAF and GWW shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CDUAF:
$9.84B
GWW:
$61.84B
CDUAF:
$0.29
GWW:
$37.26
CDUAF:
124.22
GWW:
35.01
CDUAF:
2.83
GWW:
3.39
CDUAF:
1.97
GWW:
15.73
CDUAF:
$3.46B
GWW:
$18.38B
CDUAF:
$1.39B
GWW:
$7.20B
CDUAF:
$1.76B
GWW:
$2.82B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDUAF vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank
CDUAF
GWW
CDUAF vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDUAF | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.18 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.89 | 1.36 | +5.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.11 | 2.60 | +14.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDUAF | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 0.82 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 1.00 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.74 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.56 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
CDUAF vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDUAF drawdown since its inception was -71.22%, which is greater than GWW's maximum drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDUAF and GWW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDUAF | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.22% | -56.73% | -14.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | -15.00% | +9.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.95% | -24.50% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.94% | -24.50% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.92% | -41.60% | -0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.93% | 0.00% | -17.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.89% | -11.01% | -28.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 8.29% | -6.14% |
Volatility
CDUAF vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison
Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 4.56%. This indicates that CDUAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDUAF | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 4.56% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 18.19% | -6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 24.80% | -8.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 24.67% | -5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.58% | 28.54% | -2.96% |
Dividends
CDUAF vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison
CDUAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than GWW's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDUAF Canadian Utilities Limited | 3.70% | 4.21% | 5.47% | 6.05% | 5.03% | 4.85% | 5.32% | 4.24% | 4.49% | 4.82% | 4.82% | 5.11% |
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 0.71% | 0.88% | 0.76% | 0.88% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 2.27% |
Financials
CDUAF vs. GWW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Utilities Limited and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CDUAF vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison
CDUAF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a gross profit of 761.00M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.
GWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
CDUAF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported an operating income of 393.00M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.3%.
GWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
CDUAF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a net income of 224.00M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.
GWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CDUAF and GWW have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDUAF has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to GWW (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDUAF dropped -71.22% vs GWW's -56.73%.
CDUAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDUAF and GWW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer