CDNL vs. TER

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

CDNL (Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.) and TER (Teradyne, Inc.) are both stocks. CDNL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while TER operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CDNL vs. TER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (CDNL) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDNL achieves a 181.80% return, which is significantly higher than TER's 85.93% return.

CDNL

• 1D: -3.50%
• 1M: -0.86%
• 6M: 191.70%
• YTD: 181.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TER

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -10.81%
• 6M: 65.65%
• YTD: 85.93%
• 1Y: 271.48%
• 3Y*: 49.24%
• 5Y*: 23.88%
• 10Y*: 33.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDNL vs. TER - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CDNL Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.	181.80%	5.13%
TER Teradyne, Inc.	85.93%	-3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CDNL and TER is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap CDNL : $1.04B TER : $56.29B
EPS CDNL : $1.17 TER : $5.40
PE Ratio CDNL : 58.46 TER : 66.58
PS Ratio CDNL : 1.85 TER : 15.02
PB Ratio CDNL : 3.93 TER : 18.03
Total Revenue (TTM) CDNL : $520.57M TER : $3.79B
Gross Profit (TTM) CDNL : $108.53M TER : $2.23B
EBITDA (TTM) CDNL : $66.22M TER : $1.11B

Return for Risk

CDNL vs. TER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDNL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TER

TER Risk / Return Rank: 97
TER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
TER Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
TER Omega Ratio Rank: 95
TER Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
TER Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDNL vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (CDNL) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CDNL	TER	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.67	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.48	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	31.45	—

Drawdowns

CDNL vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDNL drawdown since its inception was -27.75%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNL and TER.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDNL	TER	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.75%	-97.30%	+69.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-29.09%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-58.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.75%	-25.68%	-2.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.02%	-58.58%	+49.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CDNL	TER	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	33.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	60.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	90.40%	73.04%	+17.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.40%	51.82%	+38.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.40%	46.16%	+44.24%

Dividends

CDNL vs. TER - Dividend Comparison

CDNL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDNL Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TER Teradyne, Inc.	0.14%	0.25%	0.38%	0.41%	0.50%	0.24%	0.33%	0.53%	1.15%	0.67%	0.94%	1.16%

Financials

CDNL vs. TER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CDNL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 34.19M and revenue of 167.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.

TER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 780.95M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.

CDNL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. reported an operating income of 14.78M and revenue of 167.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

TER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 473.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.

CDNL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. reported a net income of 13.59M and revenue of 167.51M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

TER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 398.91M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDNL and TER in my portfolio?

CDNL and TER have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.