CDNL vs. TER
CDNL (Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.) and TER (Teradyne, Inc.) are both stocks. CDNL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while TER operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CDNL vs. TER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDNL achieves a 155.96% return, which is significantly higher than TER's 90.11% return.
CDNL
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -16.65%
- 6M
- 145.69%
- YTD
- 155.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TER
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 52.66%
- YTD
- 90.11%
- 1Y
- 253.91%
- 3Y*
- 49.54%
- 5Y*
- 24.17%
- 10Y*
- 34.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.73M | $48.76M | $46.88M | |
| $1.53B | $1.39B | $1.68B |
CDNL vs. TER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CDNL Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. | 155.96% | 5.13% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 90.11% | -3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDNL and TER is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.42 |
Fundamentals
CDNL:
$946.48M
TER:
$57.56B
CDNL:
$1.17
TER:
$7.28
CDNL:
53.10
TER:
50.51
CDNL:
1.68
TER:
13.02
CDNL:
3.57
TER:
0.02
CDNL:
$520.57M
TER:
$4.46B
CDNL:
$108.53M
TER:
$2.65B
CDNL:
$66.22M
TER:
$1.42B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDNL vs. TER — Risk / Return Rank
CDNL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TER
CDNL vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (CDNL) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDNL | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDNL vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDNL drawdown since its inception was -37.66%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNL and TER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDNL | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.66% | -97.30% | +59.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -33.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.38% | -24.01% | -10.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -58.54% | +47.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.96% | — |
Volatility
CDNL vs. TER - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDNL | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 29.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.60% | 73.88% | +15.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.60% | 52.71% | +36.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.60% | 46.68% | +42.92% |
Dividends
CDNL vs. TER - Dividend Comparison
CDNL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNL Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% |
Financials
CDNL vs. TER - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. and Teradyne, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CDNL vs. TER - Profitability Comparison
CDNL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 34.19M and revenue of 167.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.
TER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 794.62M and revenue of 1.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.8%.
CDNL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. reported an operating income of 14.78M and revenue of 167.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
TER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 437.81M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.9%.
CDNL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. reported a net income of 13.59M and revenue of 167.51M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.
TER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 374.53M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CDNL and TER have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CDNL and TER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer