CDNL vs. PSI
CDNL (Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.) is a stock, while PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CDNL vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDNL achieves a 181.80% return, which is significantly higher than PSI's 102.18% return.
CDNL
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 191.70%
- YTD
- 181.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSI
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- 6M
- 79.41%
- YTD
- 102.18%
- 1Y
- 158.52%
- 3Y*
- 52.99%
- 5Y*
- 31.44%
- 10Y*
- 33.42%
CDNL vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CDNL Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. | 181.80% | 5.13% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 102.18% | -3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDNL and PSI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDNL vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
CDNL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSI
CDNL vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (CDNL) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDNL | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 29.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDNL vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDNL drawdown since its inception was -27.75%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNL and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDNL | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.75% | -62.96% | +35.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.75% | -15.12% | -12.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -15.89% | +6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.26% | — |
Volatility
CDNL vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDNL | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.40% | 45.80% | +44.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.40% | 39.64% | +50.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.40% | 36.00% | +54.40% |
Dividends
CDNL vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
CDNL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNL Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.03% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDNL and PSI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CDNL and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer