CDNL vs. TSLA
CDNL (Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.) and TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) are both stocks. CDNL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while TSLA operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CDNL vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDNL achieves a 181.80% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -9.33% return.
CDNL
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 191.70%
- YTD
- 181.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- -8.37%
- YTD
- -9.33%
- 1Y
- 30.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- 39.16%
CDNL vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CDNL Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. | 181.80% | 5.13% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -9.33% | 1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDNL and TSLA is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
CDNL:
$1.04B
TSLA:
$1.53T
CDNL:
$1.17
TSLA:
$1.10
CDNL:
58.46
TSLA:
371.82
CDNL:
1.85
TSLA:
14.72
CDNL:
3.93
TSLA:
17.15
CDNL:
$520.57M
TSLA:
$97.88B
CDNL:
$108.53M
TSLA:
$18.66B
CDNL:
$66.22M
TSLA:
$10.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDNL vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank
CDNL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLA
CDNL vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (CDNL) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDNL | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDNL vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDNL drawdown since its inception was -27.75%, smaller than the maximum TSLA drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNL and TSLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDNL | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.75% | -73.63% | +45.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.75% | -16.76% | -10.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -22.70% | +13.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.55% | — |
Volatility
CDNL vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDNL | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.40% | 44.86% | +45.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.40% | 59.30% | +31.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.40% | 59.23% | +31.17% |
Dividends
CDNL vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison
Neither CDNL nor TSLA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CDNL vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CDNL vs. TSLA - Profitability Comparison
CDNL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 34.19M and revenue of 167.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.
TSLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
CDNL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. reported an operating income of 14.78M and revenue of 167.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
TSLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
CDNL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. reported a net income of 13.59M and revenue of 167.51M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.
TSLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CDNL and TSLA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CDNL and TSLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer