CDL vs. VIG
CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both Dividend funds - CDL tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index while VIG tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CDL returned 11.17%/yr vs 13.03%/yr for VIG. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CDL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
CDL vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 9.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CDL has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 11.17%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.03% annualized return.
CDL
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 1Y
- 22.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.29%
VIG
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $504.48K | $625.50K | $553.90K | |
| $229.58M | $245.27M | $258.85M |
CDL vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 17.17% | 9.04% | 15.58% | 3.03% | -0.45% | 33.42% | -3.35% | 26.38% | -5.86% | 16.29% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 9.71% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDL and VIG is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CDL and VIG has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CDL vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDL
VIG
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
CDL
VIG
Financial Services
CDL
VIG
Consumer Defensive
CDL
VIG
Energy
CDL
VIG
Healthcare
CDL
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
CDL
VIG
Technology
CDL
VIG
Communication Services
CDL
VIG
Industrials
CDL
VIG
Basic Materials
CDL
VIG
Real Estate
CDL
VIG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDL vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
CDL
VIG
CDL vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDL | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 2.28 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 9.28 | +4.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDL vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDL | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.03% | -46.81% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.66% | -7.91% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.87% | -14.95% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.28% | -20.39% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.03% | -31.72% | -9.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -1.06% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -5.47% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.94% | -0.35% |
Volatility
CDL vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.69%. This indicates that CDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDL | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 2.69% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | 7.61% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 10.14% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 14.20% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 16.02% | +1.02% |
CDL vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDL vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than VIG's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.06% | 3.33% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 3.31% | 2.60% | 3.32% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 2.87% | 2.97% | 1.28% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.50% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDL and VIG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDL has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to VIG (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.03% vs 11.17% for CDL. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CDL.
CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 1.50% for VIG.
CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.04% for VIG.
CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDL and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer