PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDL vs. PWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDL vs. PWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 12.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CDL has underperformed PWV with an annualized return of 10.83%, while PWV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.81% annualized return.


CDL

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
10.43%
6M
10.31%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
10.83%

PWV

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.43%
YTD
12.10%
6M
12.38%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
11.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDL vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
10.43%9.04%15.58%3.03%-0.45%33.42%-3.35%26.38%-5.86%16.29%
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
12.10%19.65%14.48%10.36%-1.16%29.06%-3.77%29.84%-14.12%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and PWV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.86

The correlation between CDL and PWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDL vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PWV
PWV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDL vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDLPWVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

2.74

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

3.93

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.48

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

6.28

-3.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.35

21.16

-9.81

CDL vs. PWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the PWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and PWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDLPWVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.74

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.88

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.69

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.41

+0.23

Drawdowns

CDL vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, smaller than the maximum PWV drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and PWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDLPWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.03%

-49.04%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-4.05%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-14.31%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.28%

-16.36%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

-37.67%

-3.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-0.51%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-9.50%

+5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.20%

+0.39%

Volatility

CDL vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) at 2.35%. This indicates that CDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDLPWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.35%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

6.62%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

9.31%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

14.35%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

17.16%

-0.12%

CDL vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PWV's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDL vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than PWV's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.17%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
1.81%2.12%2.08%2.16%2.29%1.89%2.66%2.24%2.34%1.55%2.35%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDL and PWV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDL has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to PWV (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs PWV's -49.04%.

On 10-year performance, PWV leads with 11.81% vs 10.83% for CDL. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PWV has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.

CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 1.81% for PWV.

CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.58% for PWV.

PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDL and PWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer