CDL vs. PWV
CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - CDL tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index while PWV tracks the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CDL returned 10.83%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for PWV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CDL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PWV.
Performance
CDL vs. PWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 12.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CDL has underperformed PWV with an annualized return of 10.83%, while PWV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.81% annualized return.
CDL
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 18.04%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
PWV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 12.38%
- 1Y
- 25.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
CDL vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 10.43% | 9.04% | 15.58% | 3.03% | -0.45% | 33.42% | -3.35% | 26.38% | -5.86% | 16.29% |
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 12.10% | 19.65% | 14.48% | 10.36% | -1.16% | 29.06% | -3.77% | 29.84% | -14.12% | 16.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDL and PWV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015 | 0.86 |
The correlation between CDL and PWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDL vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank
CDL
PWV
CDL vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDL | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 2.74 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 3.93 | -1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.48 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 6.28 | -3.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | 21.16 | -9.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDL | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.74 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.88 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.69 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.41 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
CDL vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, smaller than the maximum PWV drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and PWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDL | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.03% | -49.04% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.66% | -4.05% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.87% | -14.31% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.28% | -16.36% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.03% | -37.67% | -3.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | -0.51% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -9.50% | +5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.20% | +0.39% |
Volatility
CDL vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) at 2.35%. This indicates that CDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDL | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 2.35% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.86% | 6.62% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.75% | 9.31% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 14.35% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 17.16% | -0.12% |
CDL vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PWV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDL vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison
CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than PWV's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.17% | 3.33% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 3.31% | 2.60% | 3.32% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 2.87% | 2.97% | 1.28% |
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 1.81% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDL and PWV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDL has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to PWV (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs PWV's -49.04%.
On 10-year performance, PWV leads with 11.81% vs 10.83% for CDL. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PWV has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.
CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 1.81% for PWV.
CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.58% for PWV.
PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDL and PWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer