PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDEI vs. SPXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDEI vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CDEI

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.25%
6M
9.37%
YTD
10.88%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
10Y*

SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDEI vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CDEI and SPXM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.52

The correlation between CDEI and SPXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDEI vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDEI
CDEI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CDEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDEI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CDEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDEI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDEI vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDEISPXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.10

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

9.84

+0.10

CDEI vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDEI Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDEI and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDEI vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and SPXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDEISPXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.46%

-5.08%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

-5.08%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.75%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-0.78%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

Volatility

CDEI vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that CDEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDEISPXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

0.00%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

3.99%

+5.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.40%

7.68%

+4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.01%

7.64%

+7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.01%

7.64%

+7.37%

CDEI vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDEI vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CDEI
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF
0.98%1.05%1.22%1.16%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDEI and SPXM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDEI has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDEI dropped -19.46% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

On 1-year performance, CDEI leads with 22.84% vs 8.67% for SPXM. On fees, CDEI is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CDEI has performed better with a 22.84% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDEI is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.

CDEI has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CDEI and 0.47% for SPXM.

CDEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDEI and SPXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer